迈向对抗式刑事卷宗--基于推进庭审实质化的分析  

The Adversarial Criminal Dossiers:Based on the Analysis of Promoting the Substantive Trial

作　　者：梁迎修[1] 王雷 LIANG Yingxiu;WANG Lei(Law School,BNU,Beijing 100875;Legislative Affairs Commission,NPC,Beijing 100805,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875 [2]全国人大常委会法制工作委员会刑法室,北京100805

出　　处：《北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期100-111,共12页Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：当下的司法改革致力于通过隔断法官庭审前与卷宗的联系渠道来实现庭审实质化,但实践证明,此种进路的改革削弱了卷宗对于法官判断的全面支撑,导致庭审混乱并损及庭审效能;鉴于阅卷式裁判的制度惯性,更为可行的路径是去改造卷宗,并通过加强案卷移送尝试将阅卷式裁判与庭审实质化进行调和,在强化卷宗对抗性的基础上提高法官阅卷的全面性,进而实现庭审实质化的目标。为此需要落实追诉机关全面收集证据的责任,保障律师意见及其他辩护材料全面附入卷宗,借助于卷宗的公开与责任属性强化辩护权的保障,使法官聚焦案件争点,提高庭审效率。Current judicial reforms aim to make trials substantive by cutting off the judges'pre-trial access to the dossiers.However,practice has proved that this kind of reform weakened the overall support of dossiers for judges'judgment,led to court trial confusion and impaired court trial efficiency.Considering the inertia of the“reading-style judgment”system,a more feasible approach is to reform the dossiers and try to harmonize the reading-style judgement and substantive court trial by strengthening the transfer of case files.In order to realize the substantive court trial,the emphasis of reform should be made on improving the comprehensiveness of judges'reading files on the basis of reinforcing the antagonism of dossiers.As a result,it is very necessary to implement the responsibility of the prosecution organ to comprehensively collect evidence,ensure that lawyers'opinions and other materials are fully attached to the dossiers,and strengthen the protection of the right to defense by virtue of the openness and responsibility attributes of the dossiers,so that judges can focus on the issues of the case and improve the trial efficiency.

关 键 词：阅卷式裁判 庭审实质化 对抗式刑事卷宗 辩护卷宗移送制度 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]