基于语料库的汉语二语写作篇章组构模式比较研究  

A Corpus-based Comparative Study of the Discourse Organization Patterns of L2 Chinese Compositions

作　　者：姜有顺 刘豪妍 JIANG You-shun;LIU Hao-yan(Southwest University,Chongqing 400715)

机构地区：[1]西南大学国际学院,重庆400715

出　　处：《汉语学习》2023年第2期83-92,共10页Chinese Language Learning

基　　金：2020年度国家社科基金后期资助项目“汉族语作为第二语言的‘把’字句语义及语用习得研究”(项目编号:20FYYB033);2021年重庆市语言文字科研项目一般项目“来华留学生心理健康教育专门用途汉语课程开发与教材编写的多学科协同研究”(项目编号:YYK21225);西南大学2022年中央高校基本科研业务费人文社会科学项目能力提升项目“二语语用学视域下来华留学生对汉语学术话语的习得研究”(项目编号:SWU2209234)资助。

摘　　要：本研究选取母语为英语的汉语二语中高级学习者参加高等汉语水平考试的议论文作文为语料,根据官方阅卷人的作文评分,抽选高分组作文(HS)和低分组作文(LS),进而对比考察两组作文使用的篇章组构模式(DOP)的频率、密度及其分布特征。结果发现:(1)HS更均衡地使用多种DOP,LS则过度使用了跳跃型;(2)链接型是HS最常用、LS次常用的DOP;(3)HS对话题同一型的习得水平高于LS;(4)HS和LS均最少使用交叉型。结论可以从3个角度进行解读:(1)特定DOP自身的编码复杂程度或使用难度;(2)高水平和低水平二语写作者在组篇能力、文体意识等方面的差距;(3)母语者阅卷人对特定DOP的偏好。This paper selected the argumentative essays written by the English-speaking intermediate-advanced learners of Chinese as a second language on the site of the Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi(Chinese Proficiency Test,HSK)Advanced Level as the corpus,sampled the high-score(HS)and low-score(LS)groups according to the HSK official raters’scoring,and compared the frequency,density and distribution of the discourse organization patterns(DOP)between HS and LS.Results show that:(1)HS uses a more balanced variety of DOPs,while LS overuses the Jumping Pattern.(2)The Linking Pattern is the most commonly used DOP by HS and the second most commonly used by LS.(3)HS has a higher level of acquisition of the Consistent Topic Pattern than LS.(4)The Crossing Pattern is least used by HS and LS.The findings can be interpreted from three perspectives:(1)Coding complexity or difficulty of particular DOPs.(2)Gaps in discourse organization ability and stylistic awareness of high-level and low-level L2 writers.(3)Preference of the native raters for particular DOPs.

关 键 词：汉语二语写作 篇章组构模式 话题链 

分 类 号：H195.1[语言文字—汉语]