检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马锐 王宇 李玉鑫 王正君 周郁秋[1] MA Rui;WANG Yu;LI Yuxin;WANG Zhengjun;ZHOU Yuqiu(School of Nursing,Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150081,China;Department of Nursing,Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital,Zhengzhou 451460,China)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学护理学院,黑龙江省哈尔滨市150081 [2]阜外华中心血管病医院护理部,河南省郑州市451460
出 处:《中国全科医学》2023年第23期2907-2911,共5页Chinese General Practice
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(72074063);黑龙江省省属高等学校基本科研业务费基础研究项目(JFQN202103)。
摘 要:背景量表编制过程中,编制者与目标人群对条目可能存在理解偏差,从而影响数据收集的准确性。目的应用认知性访谈对精神分裂症患者求助动机量表条目进行调整。方法2021年12月—2022年1月,通过目的抽样法选取就诊于大庆市精神专科医院的30例患者进行3轮认知性访谈,收集访谈资料。结合问题评估系统(QAS-99)编码结果及经专家小组意见对量表条目进行修改。结果第1轮访谈,受访者对11个条目提出疑义,有3个条目与“措辞”相关,有7个条目与“模糊”相关,有2个条目与“知识”相关,1个条目与“回忆困难”相关,经讨论后部分条目进行了修改;第2轮访谈,受访者认为1个条目假设不恰当,经讨论后进行修改;第3轮访谈,受访者认为无条目需要修改,访谈停止。结论认知性访谈能够有效解决精神分裂症求助动机量表编制过程中的编制者与患者之间的理解差异问题,从而提高了量表的准确性与适用性。Background The accuracy of data collection can be affected by bias in the understanding of the items between the developer and the target population during scale development.Objective To adjust the items of the Schizophrenia Help-seeking Motivation Scale using the cognitive interview.Methods A purposive sampling method was used to select 30 schizophrenia patients from a psychiatric hospital in Daqing City from December 2021 to January 2022 to attend three rounds of cognitive interviews.The interview data were collected,and coded using the Question Appraisal System(QAS-99),and after the coding results were collated,the scale entries were adjusted by integrating respondent feedback and expert panel comments.Results During the 1st round of interview,interviewees raised doubts on 11 entries,among which three were due to wording,seven were due to vague expressions,two were due to lack of inadequate knowledge,and one was due to the difficulty in recalling.And some of the entries were revised after discussion.The results of the 2nd round of interview showed that one entry was assumed to be inappropriate and was revised after discussion.The 3rd round of interview continued until the interviewees were able to understand the entries correctly,and they thought that there was no need to further revise the entries.Conclusion The cognitive interview effectively solved the problem of understanding differences between the developer and schizophrenia patients in the development of the Schizophrenia Help-seeking Motivation Scale,thus improving the accuracy and applicability of the scale.
关 键 词:动机性访谈 精神分裂症 小组访谈 求助行为 行为评定量表
分 类 号:R749.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学] R395[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.33.133