检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭午兵 Peng Wubing(Graduate School,People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China)
出 处:《河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2023年第1期94-100,共7页Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)
摘 要:侦查机关在立案阶段实际存在着较大裁量空间,但由于规范原因以及现实原因的叠加影响,裁量极易走向异化与失范。为消除不当裁量,应着眼于提高规范的可操作性、明确性,以侦查活动规律为基准,根据“由事立案”“由人立案”不同立案模式特点,对立案条件进行分别理解,并对立案条件的适用提供客观参照依据。同时应着力于打破立案阶段侦查机关的权力封闭运行格局,以检察机关提前介入制度化为抓手加强外部监督。The discretion is flexible for the investigative organization in case filing,which is prone to alienation and anomy due to the superimposed influence of normative reasons and practical reasons.The operability and clarity of the standards should be improved to eliminate improper discretion.Based on the law of investigation activities,the case filling conditions should be studied according to the characteristics of filing issuesor filing individuals,and the objective reference should be clear for the application of filing conditions.The investigative organization should be open and transparent in case filling and the procuratorial organization should intervene at the early stage to strengthen external supervision.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49