代理、模拟与技艺:人工智能文艺生产的哲学阐释  

Agency,Simulation,and Techne:A Philosophical Interpretation of the Production of Literature and Art by Artificial Intelligence

作　　者：陶锋[1] Tao Feng

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院、中国新一代人工智能战略发展研究院

出　　处：《哲学研究》2023年第3期56-67,127,共13页Philosophical Research

摘　　要：反思人工智能技术在文艺生产领域的本质和作用,可以更好地理解人工智能“主体”问题,澄清人工智能威胁论的思想根源。首先,从人工智能文艺的生产者来看,人工智能符合现代“代理”的特性,可以与人类共同构成艺术中的“行动者网络”。人工智能的出现成了挑战传统人类中心主义、主体中心思想的技术契机。其次,从人工智能文艺生产方式来看,艺术进入到了人工智能模拟时代,人工智能加速了文化工业的智能化发展,“真假”判断是人工智能艺术的基本判断。人工智能使得某些艺术门类而非人类艺术被终结,我们应该珍惜艺术生产的非资本化形态。最后,人工智能文艺生产体现了技术对艺术的整合,应该将人工智能严格限制在生产领域,警惕资本对技术与机器的控制,防止人工智能技术的滥用和过度自律,用审美理性来引导技术与艺术的融合。Rethinking the nature and role of AI technology in the field of literature and art production can help us better understand the“subject”problem of AI and clarify the ideological root of AI Threat theory.Firstly,from the perspective of producers of Al literature and art,AI fits the characteristics of modern“agent”and can constitute“actor network”in art together with human beings.The emergence of AI has offered a technical opportunity to challenge traditional anthropocentrism and subject-centered thought.Secondly,from the perspective of the production mode of AI literary,art has entered the era of AI simulation.AI has been accelerating the intelligentization development of cultural industry.The judgment on“true and false” is the basic one for AI art.AI only ended some types of art,but not human art itself.We should cherish the noncapitalized form of art production.Finally,the art production by AI embodies the integration of technology and art,but it should be strictly limited to the field of production.We should keep vigilant for capital's control over technology and machines,prevent the abuse and excessive autonomy of Ai technology,as well as elicit a harmonious integration of technology and art through Aesthetic Reason.

关 键 词：人工智能 文艺生产 代理 模拟 行动者网络 

分 类 号：B832.1[哲学宗教—美学]