检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侯俊杰[1] HOU Jun-jie(Department of Physical Education,Suzhou University,Suzhou 234000,Anhui,China)
出 处:《喀什大学学报》2021年第3期104-111,共8页Journal of Kashi University
摘 要:体育教学技能类型化框架是一把认识论的"钥匙",对体育教学方法的优化、体育教学本质的准确把握以及教学目标的厘定起到了重要作用.但当下,我国的体育教学技能分类却存在着对象交叉、范畴同质(不具备典型性)和无法体现学科特殊性等方面的问题.究其原因,主要在于其分类标准的概念语义射程混淆不清、系谱种属关系表述不当,存在种种理解和操作上的"同一性"障碍.为了解决这些问题,应该重新树立起以"实践性"为基准的分类原则,藉由"连续划分"的方式重构类型化标准.the frame of categorizing physical education skills is an epistemological key to grasp the essence,clarify and set goals, optimize methods of physical education. However, the present categorization of our country’s physical education has problems of overlapping objects, homogeneous categories(without typicality), and showing no particularity of discipline and so on. The reasons, mainly are that the semantic range of its criteria is confusing, the presentations of relations between pedigrees and species are improper, and there are many“identical obstacles”to understanding and operating. In order to solve these problems, we should rebuild the categorizing principle based on“practicality”, and make use of the method of“successive division”to reconstruct the criteria of categorizing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.204.106