《仲裁法》修改背景下重新仲裁制度研究  

A Study of the Re-arbitration Regime in the Context of the Revision of the Arbitration Law

作　　者：王飞涵 WANG Feihan(School of Juris Master in China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法律硕士学院,北京100088

出　　处：《牡丹江大学学报》2023年第5期61-68,共8页Journal of Mudanjiang University

摘　　要：重新仲裁是进行仲裁司法监督的重要方式,而我国的相关立法却一直处于模糊状态,直到本次《仲裁法》修改,情况才得到改善。仲裁终局性与独立性的特点使得法院不能对仲裁施加过多干涉,在权衡效益与公平后,重新仲裁制度原则上只能适用于程序瑕疵且该瑕疵值得弥补。我国关于重新仲裁的新规定基本符合上述的程序性标准与值得弥补性标准。同时,遵循维护仲裁独立性与平衡效益与公平的基本逻辑对我国重新仲裁制度的具体适用规定进行解读,可以为法院提供合理、具体、可操作的适用思路。Re-arbitration is an important way of conducting judicial supervision of arbitration,while the relevant legislation in China has been in a state of ambiguity until the current amendment to the Arbitration Law.The finality and independence of arbitration prevents the courts from interfering too much with arbitration and,on the balance of efficiency and fairness,the system of re-arbitration can in principle only be applied to procedural defects and where such defects are worth remedying.The new provisions on re-arbitration in China largely comply with the criteria.At the same time,following the basic logic of maintaining the independence of arbitration and balancing effectiveness and fairness in interpreting the specific applicable provisions of our re-arbitration regime can provide the courts reasonable,specific and operational approaches on how to apply these provisions.

关 键 词：重新仲裁 终局性 独立性 程序性标准 值得弥补性标准 证据 

分 类 号：D915.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]