作为共同体难题的骄狂——从《乌托邦》的多重镜像结构来看  

Pride as the Crux of the Community:A Perspective from the Mirror Composition of Utopia

作　　者：郝春鹏 Hao Chunpeng(Department of Philosophy,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学哲学与法政学院哲学系,上海200234

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期66-73,共8页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“近代西方历史哲学的谱系”(项目批准号:19FZXB047);2020年上海高校市级重点课程“《乌托邦》精读”的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本文旨在通过阐发《乌托邦》的“镜像结构”来呈现托马斯·莫尔对政治哲学问题的思考。严格说来,并不存在莫尔的“乌托邦”,存在的只是其笔下希斯拉德以及与之观点相左的莫鲁斯的思想。哲学思想从来包含的都是诸意见之对话而非某一定论,传统伊拉斯谟的二分理解很大程度上遮蔽了莫尔的真实意图。如《乌托邦》的第二部分必须依托第一部分的现实世界一样,在莫尔看来,古往今来讨论的“理想共同体是什么”的政治哲学问题必须还原到个体与群体的张力中才能被真正地触及到,幸福共同体的根源建基于对人性之骄狂问题的解决。The purpose of this article is to present Thomas More's thinking on political philosophy through the“Mirror Composition”of Utopia.In fact,More's“utopia”does not exist,there is only the thought of Hythlodaeus as a role.Philosophical thought has always contained a dialogue of opinions rather than a certain theory,while Erasmus'traditional understanding obscures More's real intentions.Just as the second book of Utopia must rely on the real world of the first book.In More's view,in order to think about the question of“what is the best Commonwealth”in ancient times,it must be reduced this political philosophy to the tension between individuals and groups.Commonwealth's happiness is based on overcoming the human's pride.

关 键 词：托马斯·莫尔 乌托邦 镜像结构 骄狂 沃格林 

分 类 号：B5[哲学宗教—外国哲学]