《毛传》阐释神话的“理性精神”辨正——以《大雅·生民》为中心  

The Rational Spirit of Mao Zhuan in Myth Interpreting:Starting from DaYa-ShengMin

作　　者：黄静 HUANG Jing(School of Literature,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学文学院,济南250100

出　　处：《山东青年政治学院学报》2023年第3期103-109,116,共8页Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science

摘　　要：《毛传》和三家诗说对感生神话的不同态度历来是今、古文《诗经》的一个重要分歧。相对于不避神秘、怪异的今文,古文《诗经》因不言感生、注重历史真实和社会伦理而被看作理性精神的发扬。单就《生民》《玄鸟》等篇目的传文内容来看或可成立,然综合四家诗说整体风格及其学术背景,脱离东周之际“思想巨变”和“神话历史化”的学术“惯性”,“理性精神”的定位或许还有商讨的空间。The different attitudes towards generative myth in the Mao Zhuan and the Three-School of Poetry have always been an important difference between New Text and Old Text.Compared to the New Text talking a lot about mystery,Old Text doesn't talk about generative myth and pays more attention to the historical truth.As a result,it was considered as a symbol of rational spirit.It's reasonable in terms of Sheng Min and Xuan Niao,but when considering the overall style of four-school poetry and the academic background,averting from the academic conventions of great changes and myths historization,the rational spirit needs a fresh discussion.

关 键 词：《毛传》 感生神话 理性精神 《生民》 神话历史化 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]