杨简“道一”“道二”说辨析  

Analysis of Yang Jian's"Tao One"and"Tao Two"Theories

作　　者：梁从峨 LIANG Conge(School of Marxism,Shangrao Normal University,Shangrao Jiangxi 334001,China)

机构地区：[1]上饶师范学院马克思主义学院,江西上饶334001

出　　处：《上饶师范学院学报》2023年第1期16-25,共10页Journal of Shangrao Normal University

基　　金：江西省社会科学规划项目(22ZX06)。

摘　　要：“道一”是杨简春秋学的用语,是指历史的必然趋势只有正道一途.与之相对的概念就是“道二”,是指圣人笔下春秋人物的是非两途.杨简认为“道二”体现了圣人的褒贬之意,而复归于“道一”是圣人作«春秋»的根本目的.复归“道一”的方法则是反求本心,这是杨简最为看重的简易之道.但是在具体的经学解释中,杨简的原心之论又有前后抵牾、顾此失彼的情况,说明将史事简化的方法自有内在的矛盾."Tao One"is the term of Yang Jian's The Study of the Spring and Autumn Annals,which means that the inevitable trend of history has only one right way.The opposite concept is"Tao Two",which refers to the two ways of right and wrong of the characters in the Spring and Autumn period described by the sage.Yang Jian believes that"Tao Two"reflects the praise and derogation of sages,and the return to"Tao One"is the fundamental purpose of sa-ges'Spring and Auumn Annals.The way to return to"Tao One"is to seek the original intention,which is the most important simple way of Yang Jian.However,in the specific interpretation of Confucian classics,Yang Jian's theory of original mind contradicts one another,which shows that the method of simplifying historical events has its own in-herent contradictions.

关 键 词：杨简 春秋学 道一 道二 

分 类 号：B244.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]