认罪认罚从宽制度与辩诉交易制度之比较  

Comparison Between Plea Bargaining System and Plea Leniency System

作　　者：宋星衡 SONG Xingheng(Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)

机构地区：[1]南开大学,天津300350

出　　处：《山西警察学院学报》2023年第3期28-37,共10页Journal of Shanxi Police College

摘　　要：美国的辩诉交易制度是一项以实用主义为指导,可以对罪数、罪名、量刑等事项进行广泛交易的司法制度。我国的认罪认罚从宽制度以客观真实原则为指导思想,是一项带有一定合意性质、具有某些协商性质的司法制度。这两种制度在提升司法效率、减缓法官办案压力等方面存在某些相似之处,但在司法理念及其所决定的制度内容、诉讼程序等方面都存在很大差异。相较而言,辩诉交易制度具有适用范围更广、司法效率更高、协商过程更加灵活的特点。认罪认罚从宽制度在保证司法公正上更具优势,但在辩护权的保障及公诉人与被追诉人形成合意的互动程序上仍有待加强。The U.S.plea bargaining system is a justice system guided by pragmatism,which allows for extensive transactions on matters such as the number of crimes,charges and sentencing,while China’s plea leniency system is guided by objectivity-truth principle,and is consensual and negotiatory to some degree.The two systems have certain similarities in terms of enhancing judicial efficiency and reducing pressures on judges to handle cases,but there are significant differences in terms of judicial philosophies and the contents and procedures determined by the judicial philosophies.In comparison,the plea bargaining system has a broader application scope,higher judicial efficiency,and a more flexible negotiation process.And the plea leniency system has more advantages in ensuring judicial impartiality,but still needs to be strengthened in terms of the protection of defense rights and the interactive procedures between the prosecutor and the prosecuted in forming a consensual agreement.

关 键 词：辩诉交易 认罪认罚从宽 法官参与 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]