检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺颖[1] 王治钧 HE Ying;WANG Zhijun(Management School of Tianjin Normal University,393 Binshui Road,Xiqing District,Tianjin 300387,China)
机构地区:[1]天津师范大学管理学院,天津市西青区300387
出 处:《中国科技期刊研究》2023年第3期259-266,共8页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目“基于区块链的科学论文开放式同行评议质量控制研究”(20BTQ084)。
摘 要:【目的】构建基于区块链技术的开放式同行评议系统框架,为学术评价提供有益的思路,探索高质量学术评价的实践方式,拓展区块链的应用场景。【方法】通过分析开放式同行评议应用区块链技术的内在逻辑,构建基于区块链技术的开放式同行评议系统框架。【结果】形成基于区块链的开放式同行评议系统框架及功能模块,解决身份认证与学术声誉问题、匿名评审问题、学术优先权的确权问题、公开评审的激励问题及有效监管问题。【结论】区块链技术与开放式同行评议的融合能够确保同行评议公平、公正、真实、可靠,保证学术出版质量,但仍存在一些挑战,如互操作性、系统内外学术互认规则等。[Purposes]The framework of a blockchain-based open peer review system is built in the paper,which is expected to improve academic evaluation,explore the practice of high-quality academic evaluation,and expand the application scenarios of blockchain.[Methods]We first analyzed the internal logical association of the application of blockchain to open peer review and then established the framework of a blockchain-based open peer review system.[Findings]The framework and functional modules of the blockchain-based open peer review system are developed.This system solves the problems of identity authentication and academic reputation,anonymous evaluation,confirmation of academic priority,incentive of public evaluation,and effective supervision.[Conclusions]The integration of blockchain technology and open peer review ensures the fairness,justice,truthfulness,and reliability of open peer review and the quality of academic publications,but it still faces some challenges,such as interoperability and rules of academic mutual recognition in and out of the system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.184.166