通识课与专业基础课教学改革的实践对比——以《环境保护概论》授课为例  

A Practice Comparison of the Teaching Reform Between the General and Professional Basic Course——A Case of the Teaching of“Introduction to Environment Protection”

作　　者：陈燕红[1] 蔡芫镔[2] CHEN Yan-hong;CAI Yuan-bin(Zhicheng College of Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350002,China;College of Environment and Safety Engineering of Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China)

机构地区：[1]福州大学至诚学院,福建福州350002 [2]福州大学环境与安全工程学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《宜春学院学报》2023年第3期111-115,共5页Journal of Yichun University

基　　金：福建省教育厅中青年教师教育科研项目(编号:JAT200936);福建省大学生创新创业训练计划项目(编号:S202113470016);福州大学至诚学院院级一流本科专业项目(编号:ZJ2101);2022年福州大学至诚学院院级一流本科课程建设项目《环境影响评价》

摘　　要：以《环境保护概论》近五年授课为例,基于问卷调查和教学改革实践动态数据,进行工科通识课程与专业基础课程的教学改革实践对比分析。结果表明:“一课两授”应根据不同的教学背景和授课对象,制定不同的教学内容和教学考核方式,从而实现适用于专业课和通识课的“金课”标准。研究横向扩展了课程教学改革的内容,纵向深化了“一课两授”所引起的教学过程和效果差异研究,可为类似课程的教授提供借鉴。Based on the dynamic data and questionnaire survey,a comparative study of the teaching practice reform between engineering general course and professional course has been carried out with the teaching data of“Introduction to Environmental Protection”in nearly five years.The results showed that to achieve the“gold course”standard,[KG-*4]“a class two award”should develop different teaching contents and teaching assessment according to the different education background and teaching object.The research not only horizontal extends the content of the course teaching reform,but also longitudinal deepens the differences in teaching process and effect research caused by“a class two award”.And it also can provide a reference for the teaching of the similar courses.

关 键 词：通识课 专业基础课 教学改革 对比研究 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]