从“异化劳动”到“三位一体”——试析山之内靖对《巴黎手稿》的解读  

From“Alienated Labor”to“Trinity”--An Analysis of Yamanouchi Yasushi’s Interpretation of“Paris Manuscripts”

作　　者：黄乐昕 陈良琨 HUANG Le-xin;CHEN Liang-kun(South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510630,China)

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学哲学与社会发展学院,广东广州510631

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2023年第5期1-5,共5页Journal of Harbin University

摘　　要：山之内靖是战后日本马克思主义的代表性学者,他在深入解读马克思文本的基础上,对当时占主流思想地位的市民社会主义理论和广松哲学提出质疑,认为《巴黎手稿》中早期马克思受费尔巴哈影响提出的“受苦论”先驱性地表明了生态学思想。在面对第一手稿“异化劳动”的逻辑难题上,山之内认为应由第三手稿中构建的“路德—斯密—黑格尔”三位一体关系克服,这一过程贯穿着费尔巴哈“受苦者”的中心视点。但是山之内过于强调费尔巴哈的积极意义,带有强烈的复兴“早期马克思”意图,不可避免地遮掩了马克思在其思想进路中的真实逻辑。Yamanouchi Yasushi was a representative scholar of post war Japanese Marxism.Based on in depth interpretation of Marx’s texts,he questioned the then dominant theory of civic socialism and Hiramatsu’s philosophy and believed that the“suffering theory”proposed by early Marx under the influence of Feuerbach in“Paris Manuscripts”was a pioneering manifestation of ecological thought.In the face of the logical dilemma of“alienated labor”in the first manuscript,Yamanouchi believed that it should be overcome by the“Luther-Smith-Hegel”trinity constructed in the third manuscript,which runs through the central perspective of Feuerbach’s“suffering”.However,Yamanouchi Yasushi overly emphasized the positive significance of Feuerbach,with a strong intention to revive“early Marx”,inevitably obscuring Marx’s true logic in his ideological path.

关 键 词：《巴黎手稿》 费尔巴哈 异化劳动 受苦 

分 类 号：A811.21[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]