辩诉交易制度兴起的偶然与必然——评费希尔教授《辩诉交易的胜利》  

Chance and Inevitability of the Rise of the Plea Bargaining System:Analysis Based on Fisher's Plea Bargaining's Triumph

作　　者：陈文聪 CHEN Wencong(School of Criminal Justice,China University of PoliticalScience and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《浙江工商大学学报》2023年第2期159-168,共10页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University

摘　　要：辩诉交易制度是美国刑事诉讼制度的重要组成部分,并长期受到我国法学界的关注。认罪认罚从宽制度的确立,为我们重新审视辩诉交易制度提供了契机。我国法学界尽管已经对辩诉交易制度的现状展开了充分的研究,但对其具体发展的历程和制约因素认识不足。乔治·费希尔教授的著作《辩诉交易的胜利——美国辩诉交易史》揭示了,辩诉交易制度经历了兴起、发展和彻底胜利三个发展阶段,是多方主体长期共同塑造的结果,而非顶层设计的产物。“激励机制”和“权力选择”共同作用,使得各方诉讼主体深入参与到辩诉交易之中,为该制度提供了持久的生命力。费希尔教授的研究,有助于我们更为审慎地看待刑事协商制度,更加深入地分析诉讼制度对诉讼主体的影响,产生了有益的方法论启示。The plea bargaining system is an important part of the American criminal procedure system,and has long been concerned by the legal researchers in China.The establishment of the leniency system for admitting guilt and accepting punishment provides an opportunity for us to re-examine the plea bargaining system.Although the legal circles of our country have carried out sufficient research on the current situation of the plea bargaining system,they have insufficient understanding of its specific development process and restrictive factors.George Fisher's book Plea Bargaining's Triumph:A History of Plea Bargaining in the America reveals that the plea bargaining system has experienced three stages of development:rise,expansion,and complete victory,which are the result of long-term joint shaping of multiple subjects,not a product of top-level design.The“incentive mechanism”and“power selection”work together to make the parties to the litigation deeply involved in the plea bargaining,which provides the system with lasting vitality.Fisher's research helps us to look at the criminal negotiation system more carefully,analyze the impact of the litigation system on the subject of litigation more deeply,and produce useful methodological enlightenment.

关 键 词：辩诉交易 认罪认罚从宽 制度变迁 因果关系 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]