新时期国家自然科学基金绩效评估法律制度体系建设方向——基于典型国家的比较分析  

The Construction Trend of the Legal System of Performance Evaluation of National Natural Science Fund in the New Era--Based on the Comparative Analyses of Typical Countries

作　　者：方勇[1] 汪楚媛 Yong Fang;Chuyuan Wang(School of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Chemical Technology,Beijing 100029)

机构地区：[1]北京化工大学经济管理学院,北京100029

出　　处：《中国科学基金》2023年第2期330-340,共11页Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China

基　　金：国家自然科学基金应急管理项目(L1824005)的资助。

摘　　要：在科学基金发展的新阶段引入绩效评估已被国外经验证明是行之有效的科学管理手段。从法律制度的效力出发,本文首先构建了科学基金绩效评估法律制度体系分析框架,分析了美国、日本、澳大利亚等典型创新型国家的法律制度体系,提出了指导关联、弱关联、强关联三种法律制度体系类型;然后对我国与法律制度体系相似国家的基金绩效评估法律制度体系进行了对比分析,发现我国在通用法律规范和专用法律规范方面均存在一定的缺失;最后,从制度建设、评估实施、法制文化等角度提出了我国科学基金绩效评估法律制度体系的建设方向。The introduction of performance evaluation in the new stage of the development of science fund has been proved to be an effective measure of management by foreign experience.Firstly,this paper constructs the legal system analysis framework of performance evaluation of science fund from the level of effectiveness,analyzes the legal systems of typical innovative countries such as the United States,Japan and Australia,and puts forward three types of legal systems:guiding relevance,weak relevance and strong relevance.Secondly,this paper makes comparative analyses of the legal system of performance evaluation of science fund in China and countries which have similar legal systems,and finds that there are some deficiencies in both general legal norm and special legal norm in our country.Finally,it puts forward the construction trend of the legal system of performance evaluation of science fund in China from the perspective of system construction,evaluation implementation,and legal culture.

关 键 词：科学基金 绩效评估 法律制度 比较分析 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] N12[政治法律—法学]