“十三五”职业教育国家级规划教材《健康评估》(第4版)质量的调查与分析  

QUALITY SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF HEALTH ASSESSMENT(4TH EDITION)AS THE NATIONAL PLANNING TEXTBOOK FOR VOCATIONAL EDUCATION DURING THE 13TH FIVE-YEAR PLAN PERIOD

作　　者：王红巧 毕春华[3] 魏保健 佟玉荣[5] 刘春娜[6] 刘悦 WANG Hongqiao;BI Chunhua;WEI Baojian;TONG Yurong;LIU Chunna;LIU Yue(Department of Blood Purification,Qingdao Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Qingdao 266021,China)

机构地区：[1]青岛市中医医院血液净化科,山东青岛266021 [2]青岛大学附属青岛市海慈医院血液净化科 [3]青岛滨海学院医学院 [4]山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)护理学院 [5]首都医科大学燕京医学院 [6]天津医学高等专科学校 [7]齐鲁医药学院

出　　处：《青岛大学学报（医学版）》2023年第2期296-299,共4页Journal of Qingdao University(Medical Sciences)

基　　金：青岛大学2020年教学研究与改革项目(青大教字[2020]21号JXGG2020023);山东省高等医学教育研究中心科研规划课题(2021(3)号YJKT2021007)。

摘　　要：目的调查与分析“十三五”职业教育国家级规划教材《健康评估》(第4版)的质量,为教材选用与修订提供参考依据。方法2022年6月,采用线上问卷调查方法,对1430名护理学专业学生就《健康评估》(第4版)质量进行了调查。调查结果采用卡方检验进行处理,并采用Bonferroni调整检验水准法比较不同指标优秀率之间的差异。结果本研究共收到问卷1430份,有效问卷1430份,有效问卷回收率为100%。除了数字资源之外,80%以上的学生认为教材的思想性、科学性、先进性、认识规律性、教学适应性、能力培养和逻辑性为优秀,且优良率均超过90%。思想性的优良率为99.3%,其优秀率(93.1%)明显高于其他各项指标(χ^(2)=44.027~345.973,P<0.01);数字资源的优秀率为64.7%,明显低于其他各项指标(χ^(2)=86.329~345.973,P<0.01)。结论《健康评估》(第4版)是一部优秀的教材,但其数字资源有待进一步完善。只有强化数字资源建设,实现与纸版内容的互补和协同,才能真正提高教材质量。Objective To investigate the quality of Health Assessment(4th edition)as the national planning textbook for vocational education in the 13th Five-Year Plan period,and to provide a reference for the selection and revision of textbooks.Methods In June 2022,an online questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the quality of Health Assessment(4th edition)among 1430 nursing students.The chi-square test was used to process the results of the survey,and the Bonferroni-adjusted significance level was used to compare the difference between the excellence rates of different indicators.Results A total of 1430 questionnaires were received,all of which were usable questionnaires,and questionnaire recovery rate was 100%.In addition to digital resources,more than 80%of the students thought that the textbook had excellent ideology,scientificity,advanced nature,cognitive regularity,teaching adaptability,ability training,and logic,with an excellent and good rate of>90%.Ideology had an excellent and good rate of 99.3%and an excellent rate of 93.1%,which was significantly higher than the excellent rate of other indicators(χ^(2)=44.027-345.973,P<0.01).Digital resources had an excellent rate of 64.7%,which was significantly lower than the excellent rate of other indicators(χ^(2)=86.329-345.973,P<0.01).Conclusion Health Assessment(4th edition)is an excellent textbook,but its digital resources need further improvement.The quality of textbooks can be improved by strengthening the construction of digital resources and realizing the complementation and synergy between digital resources and printed contents.

关 键 词：教材 职业教育 健康评估 教育 医学 调查和问卷 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]