刘大绅对杭辛斋师承问题的发隐及易学批评——兼从河图诠释争议比较二家思想之分野  

Liu Dashen's Research on Hang Xinzhai's Succession of Teachings and His Criticism of Hang's Yi Scholarship:Comparing the Difference between the Thought of the Two Schools from the Controversy of He tu Interpretation

作　　者：姚彬彬[1] YAO Bin-bin

机构地区：[1]武汉大学中国传统文化研究中心,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《周易研究》2023年第1期61-68,共8页Studies of Zhouyi

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目:“《周易》诠释与清代新义理学的思想源流”(21FZXB015)。

摘　　要：太谷学派的近代传人刘大绅在其著作中透露了杭辛斋师承于该学派王伯琴这一情况,针对杭辛斋诠释河图之数“阳顺阴逆”等易学观点进行批评,并系统论述了太谷学派基于丹鼎炼养之说对河图的诠释。杭辛斋的易学风格倾向于以理性思辨调和古今众说,刘大绅所宗奉的太谷学派易学则以神秘主义为思想底蕴,二家之学同源而异路。太谷学派易学虽至今仍传承不替,然因其思想路数已近于历史陈迹,只能作为“暗流”而存在;杭辛斋易学则表现出一定的“现代性”特色,切合时代精神,呈现博通气象,故能得后世之高度推崇。In his book,Liu Dashen,a modern descendant of the Taigu school,reveals that Hang Xinzhai(1869-1924)studied from Wang Boqin—a member of Taigu school and criticizes Hang Xinzhai's interpretation of the number of He tu(Yellow River Chart),such as“yang is compliance and yin is disobedience”and other opinions on Yi,and systematically discusses the Tai gu school's interpretation of He tu based on the theory of internal alchemy.The style of Hang Xinzhai's Yi scholarship inclines to reconcile the ancient and modern views with rational thinking,while the Yi scholarship of the Tai gu school practiced by Liu Dashen has mysticism as its thought's foundation.These two schools have the same sources but in different ways.Although Tai gu school's Yi scholarship has still been handed down,its influence is very limited because of their outdated ideas.Hang Xinzhai's Yi scholarship reflects the modern perspective,fits in with the spirit of the times,and is valued by later scholars.

关 键 词：太谷学派 河图 刘大绅 杭辛斋 王伯琴 神秘主义 

分 类 号：B249.9[哲学宗教—中国哲学]