鲁迅早期思想与本土语境研究述评——鲁迅早期思想研究的历史反思之二  

A Review of Lu Xun’s Early Thought and Local Context Research--The Second Historical Reflection on Lu Xun’s Early Thought Research

作　　者：孙海军 SUN Hai-jun(Lu Xun Research Institute,Shaoxing University,Shaoxing 312000,China)

机构地区：[1]绍兴文理学院鲁迅研究院,浙江绍兴312000

出　　处：《临沂大学学报》2023年第3期91-97,183,共8页Journal of Linyi University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(17FZW064)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：1980年代以来,从本土语境考察鲁迅思想的生成,成为鲁迅早期思想研究的重要路径之一。但是,现有研究大都遵循着影响研究的常规路径展开,从设定的具体议题来探寻双方之间的相似性,由此论证本土资源对鲁迅思想建构的影响。这种研究模式不仅忽视了鲁迅的主观能动性,也未能将鲁迅早期思想视作一个有机整体。更重要的是,研究者未能站在近现代转型的历史高度去反思本土思想资源在赋予鲁迅相关思维方式的同时,对其接受西方现代思想而言起到怎样的负面影响。因此,相对于常见的“复古”和“开新”式研究,“对话”式研究更值得重视。Since the 1980s,many studies have examined the generation of Lu Xun’s thoughts from the local context,which has become one of the important paths for Lu Xun’s early ideological research.However,by following the conventional path of influence research,most of the existing researches explore the similarities between the two sides from the specific issues,and thus demonstrate the influence of local resources on Lu Xun’s ideological construction.This research model not only overlooks Lu Xun’s subjective initiative,but also fails to view Lu Xun’s early thoughts as an organic whole.More importantly,researchers have failed to reflect on the negative influence of local ideological resources on Lu Xun’s acceptance of Western modern thought,while endowing him with relevant ways of thinking,from the historical perspective of modern transformation.Therefore,compared to the common“retro”and“innovative”research methods,“dialogue”research is more worthy of attention.

关 键 词：鲁迅早期思想 研究史 历史反思 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]