乾嘉考据学与中国古典学的接续和转变  

The Continuation and Transformation of Qianjia Textual Research and Chinese Classics

作　　者：赵贤莲 张兵[1] Zhao Xianlian;Zhang Bing(School of Literature,University of Jinan,Jinan 250022,China)

机构地区：[1]济南大学文学院,山东济南250022

出　　处：《齐鲁师范学院学报》2023年第3期140-149,共10页Journal of Qilu Normal University

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标项目“中华简帛文学文献集成及综合研究”(15ZDB065)、一般项目“楚简韵文整理与研究”(20BZW046)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：中国古典学的相对范畴,很难以清晰的文献边界划分,宜于从统一的方法层面着眼。在时间维度上,乾嘉考据学处于承前启后的关键位置。对其治学门径的探讨,可知其对前人的择善而行和在后世的延续发展,从而激活其治学方法在中国古典学这一领域的应用。在空间维度上,透视乾嘉考据学与西方古典学的核心方法论--语文学的异同,有助于突破传统意义上对训诂与义理关系思考的局限,从而在世界性与本土性的双重角度下,建立适合中国古典学的治学门径。The relative category of Chinese classics is difficult to clearly demarcate the document boundary,unless from the unified method level.In the time dimension,Qianjia textual research is in the key position of connecting the past with the future.By exploring the academic path of Qianjia text research,it chose good deeds for the predecessors and continued to develop in later generations,thus activating the application of his scholarship methods in the field of Chinese classics.In the space dimension,a perspective of the similarities and differences between Qanjia textual research and the core methodology of Western classics--philology,will help to break through the traditional limitations of thinking about the relationship between exegetics and righteousness,and thus establish a research approach suitable for Chinese classics from the dual cosmopolitan and local perspectives.

关 键 词：古典学 乾嘉考据学 语文学 治学路径 

分 类 号：I206.09[文学—中国文学]