论《民法典》背景下侵权补充责任的诉讼实现  

On the Realization of Litigation for Supplementary Liability for Infringement in the Context of the Civil Code

作　　者：熊雅琴 XIONG Yaqin(School of Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《牡丹江大学学报》2023年第6期39-47,共9页Journal of Mudanjiang University

基　　金：华东政法大学2022年度校级研究生创新能力培养专项资金项目阶段性研究成果(项目编号:2022-3-039)。

摘　　要：《民法典》侵权补充责任部分增加了关于“追偿权”的相关规定,但对于侵权补充责任相对应的程序法研究依旧欠缺,在实践中亦存在法条适用竞合、诉讼形态以及裁判文书表述混乱的情形。有必要明确补充责任适用法条的争议,根据过错形态进行法条的区分适用,并通过“牵连性类似必要共同诉讼理论”尝试解决在诉讼形态层面的问题,以及建议以百分之五十为补充责任人的最高赔偿限额,执行时遵循补充责任人位于第二顺位的原则明确裁判文书责任确定的标准,并由此构建关于侵权补充责任诉讼实现的合理路径。The relevant provisions on the"right of recourse"have been added to the tort supplementary liability section of the Civil Code,but there is still a lack of research on the procedural law corresponding to the supplementary liability for infringement,and in practice,there are also cases where the application of laws and regulations is competitive,the form of litigation and the expression of judgment documents are confused.It is necessary to clarify the disputes over the application of the law on supplementary liability,to distinguish and apply the laws according to the form of fault,and to try to solve the problems at the level of litigation form through the"theory of implicated similar necessary joint litigation",as well as to suggest that 50% be used as the maximum compensation limit for supplementary responsible persons,and that the standards for determining the liability of judgment documents be clarified in accordance with the principle that supplementary responsible persons are in second order when enforcing,and thus a reasonable path for the realization of tort supplementary liability litigation is constructed.

关 键 词：补充责任 侵权 安全保障义务人 诉讼实现 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]