认罪认罚从宽制度的模式选择  

Two Optional Models of Chinese Guilty Plea Process

作　　者：刘磊 Liu Lei

机构地区：[1]同济大学法学院

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2023年第2期75-86,共12页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

基　　金：中央高校科研基本业务费项目“司法供给侧改革背景下认罪契约问题研究”(项目编号:07012150028)的研究成果。

摘　　要：认罪认罚从宽制度的运作实效,与立法理念和诉讼模式息息相关。在传统治罪模式下,认罪认罚从宽程序主要以实现宽严相济的刑事政策及国家刑罚权为目标。在契约模式下,通过控辩平等协商与双方对权利的处分达成认罪契约,在诉讼公正的前提下,兼顾诉讼效率,实现案件分流。我国目前的认罪认罚从宽改革,既有传统治罪模式的内核,亦有契约精神的引入与试点探索,由于司法理念上的徘徊与司法磁场效应,目前运行的认罪从宽制度面临着转型困境。在配套制度改革的基础上,在两种改革方向上同时探索推进,才能明确我国认罪协商制度的变革方向,最终在改革中成功建立新的里程碑。How to deal with guilty plea cases is still a big challenge in China and closely connected with legislators’ideology and model of Chinese judicial system in reality.Considering Chinese traditional criminal justice intent,the current Chinese guilty plea system is actually designed to fulfill criminal policy and punish those who had commit crime.As a contract of guilty plea process,defendant may be urged to sign a guilty plea contract with prosecutor by lawyers equitably.On basis of criminal justice,China is now transplanting the system of plea bargaining to separate cases in order to make the legal process more efficient.For Chinese reforming in guilty-plea procedure,core spirit of traditional punishment model and contract ideas are combined and tried in reality.But for some unexpected reasons especially in judicial ideologies and complex magnetic context in China,it is facing with some dilemmas in the road of judicial reforming.Before the success of guilty plea reforming come true,some necessary reforming must be started firstly and march forward by two ways simultaneously.Only by these ways,Chinese guilty plea reforming can gain milestone finally with definite reforming intention.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 治罪模式 契约模式 认罪协商 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]