再论虚假仲裁案外人的权利保护:实证检视、立法比较与路径优化  

Re-Discussing the False Arbitration Outsiders Rights Protection Mechanism:Empirical Examination,Legislative Comparison and System Perfection

作　　者：颜韵 YAN Yun(School of Law,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《天津法学》2023年第1期102-112,共11页Tianjin Legal Science

摘　　要：当下虚假仲裁已呈高发、蔓延之势,案外人弱势地位愈加凸显。《中华人民共和国仲裁法(修订)(征求意见稿)》将虚假仲裁纳入其调整范畴,但虚假仲裁案外人权利保护仍存不足:缺乏有效的虚假仲裁风险防范机制;虚假仲裁的司法审查亟待完善。应建立防范虚假仲裁信息共享平台并总结虚假仲裁可识别性特征,同时仲裁机构建立虚假仲裁案件审查机制。赋予虚假仲裁案外人申请撤销仲裁裁决的主体资格,对于案外人申请不予执行仲裁裁决制度,坚持立案形式审查、合理分配证明责任,注意撤销程序与不予执行程序的衔接。False arbitration has become a common problem,and the outsiders have been in a weak position nowadays.The Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China(Draft for Public Comments)includes false arbitration in its scope of adjustment,but the protection of false arbitration outsiders'rights is still inadequate:no effective mechanism to prevent the risk of false arbitration,and judicial review of false arbitration needs to be improved.An information sharing platform should be established to prevent false arbitration and to summarise the identifiable features,while arbitration institutions should establish a mechanism to review false arbitration cases.In addition,the judicial review of false arbitration should be improved by granting the outsider the right to apply for cancellation of arbitration awards,adhering to the formal review and reasonably allocating the burden of proof,paying attention to the interface between cancellation of arbitration awards and non-enforcement of arbitration awards.

关 键 词：虚假仲裁 仲裁司法审查 不予执行仲裁裁决 撤销仲裁裁决 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]