在“审美”与“政治”之间——论文学阐释的一种当代紧张  

Between Aesthetic and Political——A Contemporary Tension in Literary Interpretation

作　　者：庞弘[1] PANG Hong(School of Literature,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu Sichuan 610068,China)

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学文学院,四川成都610068

出　　处：《内蒙古社会科学》2023年第3期149-156,F0003,共9页Inner Mongolia Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“‘阐释的边界’与当代文学理论的话语重估研究”(编号:18CZW006);四川省社会科学重点研究基地项目“西方阐释学美学的张力及其当代转向研究”(编号:23Z002)。

摘　　要：阐释是人文学术中颇具奠基性的维度。作为一种复杂的精神实践,阐释在当代呈现出“政治实用论”与“审美理想论”的紧张。政治实用论以彰显研究者的文化政治诉求为宗旨,在遮蔽文本审美经验的同时,造成阐释的“强制”以及客观性的缺失。作为对政治实用论的纠偏,审美理想论倡导对客观性的重构,主张回归到文本层面,通过细致的审美分析揭示文本中恒定不变的精神内涵。作为开启文本的两种阐释范式,政治实用论和审美理想论不应处于截然对立的状态,而是有必要形成彼此补充、相得益彰的交互性关系,这一点在人文学者对经典问题的文化阐释中得到了充分体现。Interpretation is a very foundational dimension in the humanities.As a complex spiritual practice,interpretation presents the tension between political pragmatism and aesthetic idealism in contemporary context.Political pragmatism aims to highlight the cultural and political appeals of researchers,which not only covers up the aesthetic experience of texts,but also causes the coercion of interpretation and the absence of objectivity.As a correction to political pragmatism,aesthetic idealism is devoted to the reconstruction of objectivity,calls for the return to the field of texts,and reveals the unchanging spiritual connotations of literary works through detailed aesthetic analysis.As two interpretive paradigms,political pragmatism and aesthetic idealism should not be in extreme opposition,but needs to form a relationship that complement with each other.This point is fully reflected in the cultural interpretation of classical problems by humanists.

关 键 词：阐释 政治实用论 审美理想论 客观性 经典 

分 类 号：I0-02[文学—文学理论]