检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丘明敏 胡锡挺 廖礼平 QIU Mingmin;HU Xiting;LIAO Liping(Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile Company Limited,Liuzhou 545005,China)
出 处:《汽车实用技术》2023年第7期109-115,共7页Automobile Applied Technology
摘 要:目前虚拟试验场(VPG)因开发周期短、成本低而得到广泛运用,但由于多体仿真模型与实际模型存在一定的差异,提取的硬点扭矩精度无法得到保证,故基于虚拟试验场的疲劳耐久分析可靠性存在疑义。论文以后副车架和车身为研究对象,基于虚拟试验场路面提取后副车架和车身的硬点载荷谱;分别以有扭矩和无扭矩载荷谱进行疲劳耐久仿真分析;对比疲劳耐久仿真分析的结果。对比结果显示,有扭矩和无扭矩疲劳耐久仿真分析的损伤值比值介于0.54~0.99。总体而言,基于虚拟试验场的扭矩对疲劳耐久仿真的影响较小;在扭矩精度无法保证的情况下,不影响疲劳耐久仿真分析的整体结果,从而也证明了基于虚拟试验场的疲劳耐久仿真分析的可靠性。At present,virtual proving ground(VPG)is widely used because of its short development cycle and low cost.However,due to the certain difference between the multi-body simulation model and the actual model,the torque accuracy of the hard point can't be guaranteed,and the reliability of fatigue durability simulation based on the virtual proving ground is also unreliable.This paper selects the rear sub-frame and vehicle body as the research objects;extract the hard point load spectrum of the rear sub-frame and the vehicle body by VPG simulation;and use the torque and non-torque load spectrum for the fatigue durability simulation analysis respectively;compare and analyze the results of fatigue durability simulation analysis.The comparison results shows that the damage value ratio of fatigue durability simulation analysis by the torque and non-torque load spectrum is between 0.54~0.99.In general,the torque base on VPG has less influence of the result of fatigue durability simulation.Even though the torque accuracy can't be guaranteed,the overall results of fatigue durability simulation analysis will not be affected,which also proves that the fatigue durability simulation analysis based on VPG can be reliable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.200.134