检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李永发[1] 陈舒阳 王东 LI Yongfa;CHEN Shuyang;WANG Dong(Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu 233000;Southeast University,Nanjing 210096;Anhui Science and Technology University,Bengbu 233030)
机构地区:[1]安徽财经大学工商管理学院,蚌埠233000 [2]东南大学经济管理学院,南京210096 [3]安徽科技学院管理学院,蚌埠233030
出 处:《经济与管理研究》2023年第5期3-20,共18页Research on Economics and Management
基 金:2021年安徽省社会科学规划项目(孵化项目)“中国产业政策驱动微笑曲线底部企业商业模式重塑的机制与路径研究”(AHSKF2021D08)。
摘 要:识别人工智能商业化逻辑与机制对经济结构转型升级具有重要意义。不同企业的内外部要素条件存在差异,其商业模式创新目标与路径应有所区别。本文基于35家人工智能上市公司数据,采用必要条件分析(NCA)和模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法探索性研究引致高水平或低水平颠覆型商业模式创新、高水平或低水平完善型商业模式创新的多元前因组合。研究结果显示:(1)高水平颠覆型商业模式创新路径包括内因主导、外因引导和联合驱动三种类型,高水平完善型商业模式创新存在内因主导和联合驱动两种类型;(2)良好的制度环境是高水平商业模式创新不可或缺的条件;(3)技术创新不足更可能引致高水平颠覆型商业模式创新,高技术创新在完善型商业模式创新中扮演关键角色;(4)驱动因素的匹配关系和差异化模式选择是决定商业模式创新结果的关键,因素间存在替代关系。研究结果对于中国人工智能企业商业模式创新路径选择以及数字经济高质量发展策略具有一定的启示意义。Identifying the commercialization logic and mechanism of artificial intelligence concerns the transformation and upgrading of China’s economic structure.Due to internal and external factors and conditions,enterprises’business model innovation goals and paths should be different.Based on the data of 35 listed artificial intelligence companies,this paper uses the mixed method of necessary condition analysis(NCA)and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA)to explore multiple antecedent combinations of disruptive and perfect business model innovation.The necessary condition analysis shows that all five defined antecedents are optional for disruptive business model innovation.However,the institutional environment has a high effect but fails to pass the significance test,indicating the unnecessity of disruptive business model innovation.Further analysis reveals that the institutional environment first reached the bottleneck when the disruptive business model innovation level reached 40%.After calculating combinations of antecedents that lead to different levels of business model innovation,the results are as follows.(1)There are three types of high-level disruptive business model innovation,including endogenous-led,exogenous-directed,and joint-driven.Moreover,endogenous-led and joint-driven are two types of high-level perfect business model innovation.(2)Excellent institutional environment is indispensable for high-level business model innovation.(3)Lack of technological innovation is more likely to lead to high-level disruptive business model innovation,and high-tech innovation plays a key role in perfect business model innovation.(4)The matching relationship of driving factors and the choice of differentiated models are determinants of business model innovation,and there is a substitution relationship among the factors.The findings enrich the antecedents and types of business model innovation,and provide a configuration theory perspective for choosing disruptive or perfect business model innovation.Altho
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.176.186