论补充性责任人顺序利益的实现  

On the Implementation of the Interests of the Sequential of Supplementary Liability

作　　者：张海燕[1] 杨牧 ZHANG Haiyan;YANG Mu(School of Law,Shandong University,Qingdao Shandong,266237,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东青岛266237

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第3期65-79,共15页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“国家治理体系中民事执行现代化研究”(20&ZD195)。

摘　　要：当前,我国民商事法律关于补充性责任的规定较为分散,未就补充性责任人顺序利益的保护形成统一规则,司法实践中也存在操作尺度不一致的现象。顺序执行模式与检索抗辩模式为一般保证人顺序利益提供了不同程度的保护,我国《民法典》兼具二者的特色。从实体与程序两个维度分析各类补充性责任,发现其顺序利益保护的必要性有所不同,故在承认补充性责任人可依据《民法典》第698条主张缩减责任的基础上,应根据顺序利益保护的必要性确定是否适用《民法典》第687条。此外,检索抗辩可在执行终结前提出,而执行顺序应在执行程序开始前确定,但可在执行程序中变更。The provisions of supplementary liability in China’s civil and commercial laws are scattered.There is no uniform rule on the protection of the sequential interests of supplementary liability,and there are inconsistent operating standards in judicial practice.Execution in sequence and benefit of discussion provide different degrees of protection for the interests of the sequential of the parties,and China’s Civil Code is characteristic of both.An analysis of all kinds of supplementary liability from the two dimensions of substantive and procedure reveals that the necessity of the protecting of sequential interests is different.Therefore,after admitting supplementary partners can reduce liability claims according to Article 698 of the Civil Code,the application of Article 687 should be determined according to the necessity of the protection of sequential interests.In addition,the benefit of discussion may be presented prior to the termination of execution,and the sequence of execution shall be determined prior to the commencement of the execution program,but may be changed during execution.

关 键 词：补充责任 顺序利益 先诉抗辩权 顺序执行 检索抗辩 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]