论检察机关食品安全公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿请求权  

A Study on the Procurate’s Right to Claim Punitive Damages in Public Welfare Litigation for Food Safety

作　　者：苏云[1] 魏再金[1] SU Yun;WEI Zaijin(People’s Procuratorate of Chengdu City,Chengdu Sichuan,610041,China)

机构地区：[1]成都市人民检察院,四川成都610041

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第3期80-92,共13页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：2019年,中共中央、国务院颁发了《关于深化改革加强食品安全工作的意见》,提出“探索建立食品安全民事公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿制度”。当前,检察机关在食品安全领域公益诉讼中适用惩罚性赔偿时,在依据上欠缺“检察机关享有不低于社会公益组织的诉讼请求权”的规范要件,在根基上存在惩罚功能与赔偿功能含混不清、主次不分的理论障碍。为了进一步发挥好惩罚性赔偿的功能,在未来的公益诉讼立法中,应坚持赔偿功能与惩罚功能分离原则,并以惩罚功能为基础明确赋予检察机关惩罚性赔偿请求权,同时合理构建检察机关提起公益诉讼惩罚性赔偿制度。At present,the procuratorial organ will confront obstacles when applying the powerful weapon of punitive compensation in the public welfare litigation in the field of food safety due to the lack of the normative element of“the procuratorial organ has the right to claim no less than that of the social public welfare organization”,and there is also a unclear theoretical definition and distinction of the functions of“punishment”and“compensation”.In order to give full play to the function of punitive damages,we should adhere to the separation of the“compensation”function and the“punishment”function in the future public interest litigation legislation,and give the procuratorial organ the right to request punitive damages based on the“punishment”function,and design reasonable specific systems for the procuratorial organ to institute punitive damages for public interest litigation.

关 键 词：检察机关 食品安全 惩罚性赔偿 公益诉讼 公益诉讼检察 

分 类 号：D926.3[政治法律—法学]