基于ESI数据库的“双一流”高校建设成效分析与发展建议  

Analysis of the Effectiveness and Development Recommendations for“Double First-Class”Universities Based on the ESI Database

作　　者：孙劲楠 丁佐奇 SUN Jinnan;DING Zuoqi(School of International Pharmaceutical Business;Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines,China Pharmaceutical University,Nanjing 210009,China)

机构地区：[1]中国药科大学国际医药商学院 [2]中国药科大学《中国天然药物》编辑部,南京210009

出　　处：《药学教育》2023年第3期4-9,共6页Pharmaceutical Education

基　　金：2022年江苏省研究生教育教学改革课题“江苏高校综合影响力的多维评价模型构建”,编号JGKT22_A006。

摘　　要：比对ESI数据库2021年7月和2015年11月的数据,分析“双一流”建设高校在学科分布、学科影响力等方面的变化。研究表明,新增ESI学科的“双一流”建设高校有19所,新增ESI学科共456个,增幅分别为11.32%和61.54%。137所“双一流”建设高校中有118所进入ESI排名,占比86.13%。从学科看,传统优势学科工程学、化学和材料科学增量较高,分别为110,84和81所。我国有179个学科进入全球前1‰,达到世界一流学科水平,其中“双一流”建设高校拥有171个学科,占比95.53%。总体来看,“双一流”建设成果显著,学科发展潜力巨大,但仍存在发展不均衡、缺少顶尖学科和高水平成果占比不高等问题。高校应正视ESI指标含义,科学合理制定发展计划;根据自身发展特点,采取各具特色的发展模式;主管部门也宜放眼全局,统筹引导各高校学科合作和学科布局。By comparing data from the ESI database in July 2021 and November 2015,this study analyzes the changes in discipline distribution and academic influence of“Double First-Class”universities.The research indicates that there are 19“Double First-Class”universities with newly added ESI disciplines,totaling 456 disciplines,with growth rates of 11.32%and 61.54%respectively.Among the 137“Double First-Class”universities,118 have entered the ESI rankings,accounting for 86.13%.In terms of disciplines,engineering,chemistry,and materials science,which are traditionally strong disciplines,have shown a significant increase,with 110,84,and 81 universities respectively.In China,179 disciplines have entered the top 1‰globally,reaching the level of world-class disciplines,among which“Double First-Class”universities have 171 disciplines,accounting for 95.53%.Overall,the“Double First-Class”construction has achieved remarkable results,with great potential for disciplinary development.However,there are still issues such as uneven development,lack of top-notch disciplines,and low proportion of high-level achievements.Universities should recognize the meaning of ESI indicators,scientifically and reasonably formulate development plans,adopt development models that suit their own characteristics.The authorities should also take a holistic view,coordinating and guiding interdisciplinary cooperation and disciplinary layout among universities.

关 键 词：“双一流”建设 ESI 学科建设 高被引论文 

分 类 号：G649.2[文化科学—高等教育学]