检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任怡霏 REN Yi-fei(North China Electric Power University(Baoding),Baoding Hebei 071000,China)
出 处:《齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报》2023年第3期45-47,共3页Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers College
摘 要:我国认罪认罚从宽制度自2016年试点方案实施至今,经历多次修改与完善,在全国铺开施行,在提高诉讼效率、加快诉讼进程等方面效果显著。然而被害人权利保护作为该制度的重要环节却遭受冷落,实务中各机关不断压缩被害人权利行使空间,导致出现被害人保护的真空地带。本文通过论述认罪认罚从宽制度当中被害人权利保护存在合理性,梳理我国相关立法情况,总结被害人权利保护的制度疏漏,针对缺陷提出相关解决意见。Since the implementation of the pilot scheme in 2016,the system of leniency for admission of guilt and punishment in our country has been revised and improved many times,and has been carried out all over the country.However,as an important part of the system,the protection of the rights of the victims has been neglected.In practice,the organs constantly reduce the space for the exercise of the rights of the victims,which leads to the emergence of a vacuum in the protection of the victims.This article discusses the rationality of the victim's rights protection in the system of guilty plea and leniency,combs the relevant legislation in our country,summarizes the system's omissions in the victim's rights protection,and puts forward some suggestions for solving the defects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.70.102