“告诉才处理”案件的追诉机制研究  

Research on the Prosecution Mechanism of“Cases Accepted at Complaint Only”

作　　者：赵义哲 Zhao Yizhe(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 102249)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学,北京102249

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2023年第1期59-66,共8页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：在实践中,“告诉才处理”案件的自诉人往往面临着证据不足的诉讼困境,通过自诉维护自身利益的难度较大。其原因在于,我国将告诉才处理的犯罪追诉机制一律规定为自诉。在比较法视角下,日本采取公诉垄断主义,而德国与我国台湾地区均采取公诉自诉并行主义,对我国均有借鉴价值。笔者认为,可从降低自诉起诉要求、衔接自诉转公诉、增强检察机关介入三方面对现有追诉机制进行完善。此外,基于立法目的及文义分析,也应当允许告诉才处理案件被害人通过公诉寻求救济。China’s prosecution mechanism of“cases accepted at complaint only”is private prosecution on⁃ly.In practice,private prosecutors are facing the litigation dilemma of insufficient evidence,and thus it is difficult to safeguard their own interests through litigation.From the perspective of comparative law,Japan adopts the Public Prosecution Only Doctrine for the cases accepted at complaint only,while Germany and Chinese Taiwan both adopt the Parallel Principle of Public Prosecution and Private Prosecution,which has certain reference value for us.The author believes that the existing prosecution mechanism can be im⁃proved from three aspects:reducing the requirements for private prosecution,linking private prosecution to public prosecution,and strengthening the involvement of prosecutors.In addition,from the legislative pur⁃pose and law context,the victim should also be allowed to initiate public prosecution.

关 键 词：告诉才处理 追诉机制 公诉自诉并行主义 诽谤罪 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]