检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊灿灿 黄瑾 杨邦林[2] 武晓菲 卢碧露 张莉 XIONG Can-can;HUANG Jin;YANG Bang-lin;WU Xiao-fei;LU Bi-lu;ZHANG Li(Journal of Preschool Education Research,Changsha Normal College,Changsha 410100,China;Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;China Research Institute of Care and Education of Infants and Young Children,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;Shanghai Thomas School,Shanghai 200333,China)
机构地区:[1]长沙师范学院学前教育研究杂志社,长沙410100 [2]华东师范大学教育学部,上海200062 [3]华东师范大学中国婴幼儿教养研究院,上海200062 [4]上海安生学校,上海200333
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2023年第3期615-619,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:全国教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度国家一般课题(BHA210122)。
摘 要:目的:对儿童观察记录量表(Child Observation Record Advantage,CORA)进行中文版修订,并在中国学前儿童中检验其信效度。方法:在上海和成都两地9所幼儿园中,由经过培训的教师完成对950名学前儿童的CORA中文版评定,研究者完成对相同儿童的亚太学前儿童发展量表(EAP-ECDS)评定。结果:CORA中文版的八因子结构模型拟合良好(χ^(2)/df=3.05,P<0.001,CFI=0.97,TLI=0.95,RMSEA=0.07,SRMR=0.04),且多群组验证性因素分析表明该量表的八因子结构具有跨性别的测量等值性。CORA中文版与EAP-ECDS的各分量表之间均呈正相关(r=0.12~0.65)。该量表及各分量表具有较高的内部一致性信度(0.77~0.95)和分半信度(0.73~0.88)。中国学前儿童在CORA中文版分量表的得分上存在显著的年龄差异与性别差异。结论:CORA中文版具有较好的信效度,适用于在中国幼儿园教育情景中测量学前儿童的学习与发展水平。Objective:The goal of this research was to measure the reliability and validity of the Child Observation Record Advantage(CORA)in Chinese preschoolers.Methods:950 preschoolers from 9 kindergartens in Shanghai and Chengdu were rated by their teachers using the CORA(Chinese version)and rated by researchers using the East Asia-Pacific Early Child Development Scales(EAP-ECDS).Results:The confirmatory factor analysis identified an eight-factor model of the scale(χ^(2)/df=3.05,P<0.001,CFI=0.97,TLI=0.95,RMSEA=0.07,SRMR=0.04),and multiple group analysis indicated strict measurement invariance across gender.The CORA(Chinese version)was significantly and positively associated with EAP-ECDS(r=0.12-~0.65).The scale and its subscales displayed good internal consistency reliability(0.77~0.95)and splithalf reliability(0.73~0.88).There were age and gender differences on the subscale scores.Conclusion:The Chinese version of CORA may serve as a reliable and valid evaluation instrument for Chinese Preschoolers'learning and development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147