朱子学的中心转移说——基于东亚视角的考察  

Theorizing the Shift of the Center of Learning for Master Zhu Studies: An East Asian Perspective

作　　者：谢晓东[1] Xie Xiaodong

机构地区：[1]厦门大学哲学系,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《学术研究》2023年第6期34-42,177,共10页Academic Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“明清朱子学通史”(21&ZD051)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：从东亚视角考察朱子学可以发现一个重要事实:朱子学的中心出现了多次转移。在朱子之后至罗钦顺去世之前,朱子学的中心无疑是在中国。罗钦顺之死以及16世纪中期韩国性理学的高度繁荣标志着朱子学的中心转移到了朝鲜半岛。16世纪末叶至17世纪前期韩国的内忧外患以及日本德川时代朱子学的崛起标志着朱子学的中心从朝鲜半岛转移到了日本列岛。朱子学的两次中心转移现象背后的动力是天理及其实现方式的不同。An important fact that arises when investigating Master Zhu studies from the perspective of East Asia is that its center of learning shifted several times. Based on this phenomenon, this article presents a theory explaining the shift of the center of learning for Master Zhu studies. Initially, after the time of Master Zhu and before the death of Luo Zheng’an, the center of learning for Master Zhu studies was undoubtedly in China. However, with the death of Luo Zheng’an and the height of the flourishing of Korean studies within the field of Neo-Confucian School of Principle (理学Li Xue) in the mid to late sixteenth century, the center of learning shifted to the Korean peninsula. Subsequently, from the end of the sixteenth century to the early seventeenth century, Korea’s internal and external troubles, alongside the rise of Master Zhu studies in the Tokugawa era of Japan, led to the center of learning moving from the Korean peninsula to the Japanese archipelago. The underlying driving force behind these two shifts in the center of learning for Master Zhu studies can be attributed to differences in their understanding of the Principle of Heaven (天理 Tianli) and their approaches to its realization.

关 键 词：朱子学 中心转移 东亚 动力 

分 类 号：B244.7[哲学宗教—中国哲学]