智慧检察视角下侵害未成年人案件强制报告制度的完善  

Improvement of the Compulsory Reporting System for Infringement of Minors from the Perspective of Smart Prosecutors

作　　者：李章颖 王颖 Li Zhangying;Wang Ying

机构地区：[1]北京市丰台区人民检察院第一检察部

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2023年第2期35-42,共8页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：近年来,侵害未成年人案件占比不断攀升,而囿于案发地点隐蔽、未成年人求助意识弱等原因,此类案件常陷入发现难、报案不及时、延误调查取证难的困境。为有效应对这一问题,我国初步制定了侵害未成年人案件强制报告制度。该制度实践不断细化,但仍然存在报告率低、受理部门规定混乱、未履行报告义务责任不明确不一致等问题。可以辩证地借鉴域外国家或地区的发展经验,从明确报告主体及其义务类型、确定民政部门为受理部门、充分利用大数据优势设置强制报告平台与提示程序、持续做好后续响应救助工作四个方面进行完善。In recent years,the proportion of infringement on minors has been continuously increasing.However,due to the hidden location of the case and the weak awareness of minors seeking help,such cases often fall into the dilemma of difficult discovery,delayed reporting,and delayed investigation and evidence collection.In order to effectively address this issue,China has initially formulated a mandatory reporting system for cases of infringement on minors.With the continuous refinement of this system in various regions,there are still problems such as low reporting rates,chaos of receiving departments,and unclear and inconsistent responsibilities for failure to fulfill reporting obligations.We can dialectically draw on the development experience of foreign countries or regions,and improve it from four aspects:clarifying the reporting subject and its obligation type,determining the civil affairs department as the receiving department,fully utilizing the advantages of big data to set up mandatory reporting platforms and prompt procedures,and continuously doing a good job in subsequent response and rescue work.

关 键 词：强制报告制度 智慧检察 差别响应 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]