检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李雪玉 高申春[1] LI Xueyu;GAO Shenchun(Jilin University School of Philosophy and Sociology,Changchun 130012,China)
出 处:《心理科学进展》2023年第7期1186-1194,共9页Advances in Psychological Science
摘 要:预测加工是目前认知科学和心灵哲学中一个重要的理论框架。该框架对于认知边界有两种截然不同的理解方式,分为内在主义和外在主义立场。前者主张以马尔科夫毯为证据边界,认知是内在的心智活动,是一种彻底的神经表征主义;而后者倡导该框架与具身心智、延展认知的观点相结合,以行动为导向的表征使心物之间并无静态固定的边界。两者均面临无法解释的疑难,认知限于颅内则遭遇认识的超越性困境,而动态可变的边界则受困于认知标志的模糊性。现象学在认识的本质问题上作出了富有意义的探索,它无疑为预测加工认知模型提供了反思空间。Predictive processing is now a prominent theoretical framework in cognitive science and philosophy of mind.This framework has two different ways of understanding the bounds of cognition,which are divided into internalism and externalism.The former claims that it is imperative to regard Markov blanket as an evidentiary boundary between the brain and its environment,and identify cognition as an internal mental activity,which is a kind of neuro-representationalism;The latter advocates the combination of this framework with the idea of embodied mind and extended cognition,and the action-oriented representation makes there is no static and fixed boundary between mind and matter.Both of them are faced with unexplainable difficulties.Internalism encounters the dilemma of transcendence of cognition,while externalism suffers from the fuzziness of the mark of cognition.Phenomenology has made a meaningful exploration on the nature of cognition,which undoubtedly provides a reflective space for the cognitive model of predictive processing.
分 类 号:B84-06[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170