检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李小玲 LI Xiaoling(School of International Chinese Studies,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学国际汉语文化学院,上海200062
出 处:《苏州教育学院学报》2023年第3期36-45,共10页Journal of Suzhou College of Education
基 金:上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2019BWY005)。
摘 要:就中国民间文学学科而言,学界更为关注的是学科研究的对象、内容和方法等,对于学科研究者自身却少有探讨。一个学科的发展在相当程度上取决于研究者自身的素质和水平。因此,聚焦学人本身,回望和检视中国民间文学学科形成之初,在试着廓清历史迷雾的同时,也尝试着对知识分子介入学科诸问题进行一些思考和探寻:一是就此进一步缕析中国民间文学学科缘起时的学术思考和潜在的学术话语,同时对学界固有的一些不证自明的乃至作为“常识性”的观念,譬如民间文学的民间性和其作为古旧的学说等问题予以反思;二是在钩沉史实和面向当下非遗热潮的双重视域下,对知识分子本身的自我定位及其与学科的走向等问题有所思考。In terms of the study of Chinese folk literature,the academia is concerned about the research objects,contents and methods of the discipline,but there is little discussion about its researchers.The development of a discipline largely depends on the quality and level of researchers.Therefore,the paper focus on the discipline retrieves and reviews the beginning of the discipline of Chinese folk literature,attempts to clarify the confusions in history,and to think and explore various issues related to the intellectuals’involvement in the discipline.The paper first of all further analyzes the academic ideas and the potential academic discourse when the discipline of Chinese folk literature began its history.Meanwhile,the paper reflects on several deep-rooted issues in the academia that are self-evident and even regarded as“common sense”,such as the folk nature and the antique learning of folk literature.Secondly,the paper reflects on the self-positioning of intellectuals and its relationship with the future of the discipline from the dual perspectives of delving into historical facts and dealing with the current trend of intangible cultural heritage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7