我国行政公益诉讼判决制度研究述评与展望  

Review and Prospect of the Judgment System of Administrative Public Interest Litigation in China

作　　者：涂玄 Tu Xuan(College of law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《河北科技师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期75-82,共8页Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：判决制度在我国行政公益诉讼研究主题中较为冷门,但在历经漫长的理论嬗变和实践摸索后自成体系,形成判决类型、判决的司法实践以及判决效力三条思考进路,对既有成果进行梳理是有益于完善行政公益诉讼制度体系的。判决类型方面,我国经历了由模仿传统行政诉讼判决到在诉讼类型视角下进行重构与设想的思维转变;判决的司法实践方面,法定判决方式的整体适用情况得到了观察,其中的确认判决和履行判决则被重点剖析;判决效力方面,既判力的主观范围扩张已成为共识。尽管如此,该专题仍有不少基础性的问题亟待解决,未来的研究需在方法论、研究视野和知识结构上有所改变。Research on judgment system is relatively unpopular in the field of administrative public interest litigation in China,but after a long period of theoretical transformation and practical exploration,a unique system has been created,consisting of judgment type,judgment judicial practice and judgment effect.Sorting out existing achievement can improve the administrative public interest litigation system.Judgement type has transformed from imitating to reconstructing and envisioning traditional administrative litigation judgments under the perspective of litigation types.In terms of judgment judicial practice the overall application of the statutory judgment approach has been observed,focusing on the confirming judgment and the response to judgment.In terms of the judgment validity,the expansion of the subjective scope of res judicata has become a consensus.However,There are many basic problems that need to be solved urgently,and the following research should change in methodology,vision and knowledge structure.

关 键 词：行政公益诉讼 判决类型 判决效力 司法实践 研究述评 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]