认罪认罚案件上诉问题实证研究——基于B市508件案例的分析  

Empirical Study on the Appeals of Pleading Guilty and Punishmen t Acceptance Cases:Based on the Analysis of 508 Cases in B City

作　　者：汪海燕[1] Wang Haiyan

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2023年第3期86-102,共17页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

摘　　要：对B市相关裁判文书的实证研究显示,认罪认罚案件上诉理由种类主要包括留所服刑、量刑过重、事实认定不当、法律适用错误和程序违法等。法院与检察机关对于认罪认罚案件被告人上诉的态度并不一致,而且同一系统内部对此问题的处理也不尽相同。为了完善刑事诉讼中的认罪认罚从宽制度和二审制度,在形式层面,有关机关应当在弥合理念差异的基础上,强化法律供给,对被告人上诉的问题作出统一、明确的规定;在内容层面,不仅保障被告人的上诉权,而且在上诉条件上贯彻无因上诉原则,同时不应将被告人单纯的上诉行为视为撤回认罪认罚。推动刑事诉讼中认罪认罚从宽制度的发展,不能仅停留于前期的控辩协商、配套措施的完善,也要着眼于一审裁判后的救济与纠错,唯有如此,才能实现公正与效率的双重价值。Empirical study on relevant adjudication documents in B City shows that the main types of grounds for appeal in the case of the leniency system for pleading guilty and punishment acceptance include detention in prison,excessive sentencing,improper factual determination,incorrect legal application and procedural violations.The attitude of courts and procuratorates towards appeals by defendants in such cases is not consistent,and the issue is handled diff erently within the same system.In order to improve the leniency system for pleading guilty and punishment acceptance cases in criminal proceedings and the second instance system,the relevant authorities should,at the formal level,strengthen the legal supply and make unifi ed and clear provisions on the issue of defendants’appeals,on the basis of bridging the diff erences in philosophy;at the content level,not only should the defendants’right to appeal be guaranteed,but the principle of causeless appeal should be implemented in appeal conditions,while the defendant’s mere act of appeal should not be regarded as a withdrawal of pleading guilty and punishment acceptance.In order to promote the development of the leniency system for pleading guilty and punishment acceptance cases in criminal proceedings,it is necessary to focus on the relief and correction after the fi rst instance decision,beyond the prosecution and defense negotiations and the improvement of supporting measures.Only in this way can the values of justice and effi ciency be achieved.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 二审 上诉理由 技术型抗诉 实证 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]