论公司律师的诉讼代理规制  

On the Regulation of In-House Counsel's Litigation Representation

作　　者：朱岱临 王伟[2] ZHU Dailin;WANG Wei(Law School,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China;Department of Politics and Law,Party School of the Central Committee of C.P.C(National Academy of Governance),Beijing 100091,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872 [2]中共中央党校(国家行政学院)政法部,北京100091

出　　处：《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第4期107-115,共9页Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“深化司法体制综合配套改革研究”(20ZDA033)。

摘　　要：公司律师具有执业律师与企业员工的双重身份,企业员工身份决定了其不具有和社会律师同样的独立地位。所以,公司律师从事本企业的诉讼代理时,很可能会为达到企业的组织目标而滥用律师诉讼特权,由此就产生了在公司律师制度设计中对公司律师之诉讼代理行为予以规制的必要。综合考虑社会经济效果与诉讼程序的特征,限制公司律师的诉讼代理范围,同时采取有力的保障措施以补强其独立性,是对公司律师诉讼代理有效规制的可行路径。In-house counsels have dual identities as practicing lawyers and corporate employees.Their corporate employee status determines that they do not have the same independent status as practicing lawyers.Thus,when they are engaged in litigation representation of their own companies,they are likely to achieve the organizational goals of the company.The abuse of the attorney litigation privilege leads to the necessity of regulating the in-house counsel's litigation representation.Considering the socio-economic effects and the characteristics of litigation procedures,limiting the scope of litigation representation of in-house counsels,and taking strong safeguard measures to strengthen their independence is a feasible path for the effective regulation of the in-house counsel's litigation representation.

关 键 词：公司律师 诉讼代理 律师诉讼特权 独立性 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]