梁启超、钱穆同名《中国历史研究法》史学理念平议  

Historical Concepts of Liang Qichao and Qian Mu Viewed from Their Work of the Same Title“Law of the Study of Chinese History”

作　　者：曾侨 ZENG Qiao

机构地区：[1]湖北大学历史文化学院,湖北武汉430062

出　　处：《五邑大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第3期27-32,92,共7页Journal of Wuyi University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：梁启超、钱穆同名《中国历史研究法》表达了他们对各自所处时代的史学思考。就相同点而言,二人都强调治史的现实意义;都主张史学应阐发中华文化在世界文明体系中的价值。就不同点而言,梁启超注重辨析推动历史发展的动力,希冀调和“英雄史观”与“人民史观”的矛盾;钱穆关注构成历史主体的内涵,提出“文化即是历史”的观点。两部同名著作体现了学术代际递嬗过程中的继承性与发展性,凸显了梁启超和钱穆在不同时代学风下的学术追求。Liang Qichao and Qian Mu’s eponymous Law of the Study of Chinese History expressed their historical reflections in their respective eras.In terms of similarities,both Liang Qichao and Qian Mu emphasized the practical significance of studying history;they both advocated that historiography should elucidate the values of Chinese culture in the world civilization system.In terms of differences,Liang focused on distinguishing and analyzing the driving forces behind historical development,hoping to reconcile the contradiction between the“hero-dominant historical view”and the“people-dominated historical view”;Qian focused on the connotation of the subject of history and proposed the view that“culture is history”.The two works of the same name reflect the inheritance and development in the process of intergenerational academic evolution,and highlight the academic pursuit of Liang Qichao and Qian Mu in different times.

关 键 词：梁启超 钱穆 《中国历史研究法》 史学思想 学术史 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]