认罪认罚从宽制度中控辩失衡的反思与规则重构  

The Reflection and Rule Reconstruction of the Imbalance of Prosecution and Defense in Chinese Plea Bargaining

作　　者：陈殿福 王明振 Chen Dianfu;Wang Mingzhen(Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court,Zhengzhou,Henan 450000)

机构地区：[1]郑州市中级人民法院,河南郑州450000

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2023年第4期135-144,共10页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：认罪认罚从宽制度作为自上而下的司法制度改革,对原有的司法结构产生重大冲击,控辩沟通模式与控审职权的协调成为制度运行核心。但在该制度运行中,存在着诉讼构造异化、控辩两方结构失衡的问题,偏离了控辩平等沟通的立法设想和制度规制,需要在认罪认罚从宽制度的价值导向层面下,从认罪认罚从宽制度实施中事实定性、量刑沟通等层面进行规则重构。在检察院主导下,法院部分定罪权前移,法官应当在坚持证据裁判规则基础上进行独立判断,从而保障制度的价值预设得以最大程度的实现。As a top-down reform of the judicial system,the Chinese plea bargaining system has a significant impact on the original judicial structure,and the coordination between the communication mode of prosecution and defense and the authority of prosecution and trial has become the core of the system operation.However,in the operation of this system,there are issues of alienation in litigation structure and imbalance in the structure of the prosecution and defense,which deviate from the legislative vision and institutional regulations of equal communication between the prosecution and defense.Therefore,it is necessary to reconstruct the rules from the perspective of factual nature determination and sentencing communication in the implementation of the Chinese plea bargaining system,under the value orientation level of the Chinese plea bargaining system.Under the leadership of the procuratorate,some of the court’s power to convict has been moved forward,and judges should make independent judgments based on adhering to the rules of evidence adjudication,in order to ensure the maximum realization of the value preset of the system.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 平等沟通 控辩失衡 规则重构 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]