检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭福成[1] 晏行伟 GUO Fucheng;YAN Xingwei(College of Electronic Science and Technology,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China)
机构地区:[1]国防科技大学电子科学学院,湖南长沙410073
出 处:《国防科技》2023年第3期52-58,共7页National Defense Technology
基 金:军队科研基金(2022-JCJQ-JJ-0629)。
摘 要:随着无人机技术的迅速发展和广泛应用,无人机逐渐成为战场和要地防御上越来越重要的威胁之一。利用电磁频谱探测无人机下行链路信号存在无人机通信信号特征建库难、采用4G/5G网络通信的无人机难以识别、微弱无人机信号淹没于城市/战场复杂电磁环境中、采用自主控制不发射测控/图传信号的无人机无法探测等问题。利用电磁频谱手段对无人机进行定位时,分析和对比常用的多站测向交叉和时差定位体制,认为采用时差定位系统可以取得较好的定位精度。最后指出在无人机反制干扰中,可使用电磁压制干扰、卫星导航诱骗、协议破解操控多种技术手段,并分析其运用时面临的难题。Due to their rapid development and widespread use,Unmanned Autonomous Vehicles(UAVs)have become an increasingly pertinent threat on the battlefield,especially for point defenses.The detection of UAV downlink signals via electromagnetic spectrum monitoring is challenging because it is difficult to construct a database of UAV communication signals or recognize UAVs using 4G/5G networks.Furthermore,UAV signals tend to be obscured by the complex electromagnetic environment of cities or battlefields,and it is impossible to detect fully autonomous UAVs that do not emit image transmissions or control signals.In this study,two common spectrum monitoring techniques for UAV localization are analyzed and compared,that is,intersection of lines-of-bearing(LOBs)between multiple Direction-Finding(DF)stations and Time Difference of Arrival(TDOA)localization,in terms of their positioning error distributions.It is found that the TDOA localization system can be highly precise.Finally,UAV countermeasures such as electromagnetic jamming,Global Navigation Satellite System(GNSS)spoofing,and radio protocol cracking are discussed,and the challenges of deploying these methods are analyzed.
分 类 号:TN972[电子电信—信号与信息处理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43