认罪认罚之普通审案件的庭审模式  

On the Trial Mode of Ordinary Procedure Trials in the Case of Leniency Based on the Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment

作　　者：李倩 LI Qian(School of Law,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)

机构地区：[1]天津大学法学院,天津300072

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2023年第2期78-88,共11页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“现代法治视野下侦查行为的起点问题和法律边界研究”(19BFX079)。

摘　　要：在认罪认罚案件中,被追诉人认罪认罚的“自愿性”不一定真实,而“非自愿”会导致被追诉人认罪自白的虚假。为合理解释《刑事诉讼法》第二百零一条“一般应当”条款所体现的审前具结对一审法官的约束力,对于适用普通程序简化审理的认罪认罚案件,法官要在庭审程序中以确保控辩之间的前期交涉合法为目的,落实职权调查原则,发挥审判职能。对于此类案件,为了防范被追诉人虚假认罪导致审前具结无法发挥对一审法官的拘束力,一方面,可搭建法官主导的认罪认罚庭审交流机制,向被追诉人提供与法院、检察院进行“法律沟通”的平等机会;另一方面,法官应强化认罪认罚案件的司法透明度,提升判决书的说理性。法官通过严格履行庭审中的程序性义务,防范被追诉人作出“非自愿”“非可信”的审前认罪自白。检察机关应严守法律监督职能,做好认罪认罚案件的法律守门人。In the case of leniency based on the Pleading Guilty and Accepting Punishment,the“voluntariness”of the defendant's admission of guilt and punishment is not necessarily true,and the“involuntary”will lead to the untrue confession of the defendant's guilt.In order to reasonably interpret the binding force of the pretrial settlement on the judge of the first instance embodied in the“general should”clause in Article 201 of the Criminal Procedure Law,for cases of plea guilty and accepting punishment that are simplified by ordinary procedures,the judge must ensure the prosecution and defense during the trial procedure.The purpose of the preliminary negotiation between them is to be legitimate,to implement the principle of authority investigation,and to exert the judicial function.In such cases,in order to prevent the pretrial settlement from being unable to exert its binding force on the first-instance judge due to the false confession of the accused,on the one hand,a judge-led exchange mechanism for pleas and punishments in court trials can be established to provide the accused with equal opportunities for“legal communication”with the judge and the prosecutor;on the other hand,the judges should strengthen the judicial transparency of plea cases and improve the rationality of judgments.By strictly abiding by the procedural obligations during the trial,the judges prevent the accused from making“involuntary”and“untrustworthy”pretrial confessions.The procuratorial organs should strictly abide by the function of legal supervision,and be good legal gatekeepers in the case of confession and punishment.

关 键 词：自白 自愿性 可信性 庭审模式 法律沟通 法庭义务 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]