李吉甫谥号之争与唐宪宗朝的淮西政策  

Dispute on Li Jifu's Posthumous Title and Huaixi Policy during Emperor Xianzong of Tang

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:朱华 ZHU Hua(College of History,Taishan University,Tai'an,Shandong 271000,China)

机构地区:[1]泰山学院历史学院,山东泰安271000

出  处:《保定学院学报》2023年第4期35-39,共5页Journal of Baoding University

摘  要:李吉甫谥号之争实际上并不是谥号用字的分歧,其本质乃是唐廷淮西政策之争:张仲方反对李吉甫得谥“敬宪”,主要理由是唐廷在淮西之役中陷入僵持且前景黯淡,身为宰辅的李吉甫因主张开战应负主要责任,其实质是对淮西之役以至削藩政策的不满,即认可吴元济仿河朔藩镇自立,唐廷中部分官员也持此种观点,这与削藩之论格格不入;唐宪宗贬黜张仲方而特赐李吉甫“忠懿”之谥,则传递出宪宗对淮西之役的肯定,并预示了削藩政策在日后宪宗朝的贯彻。The debate over Li Jifu's posthumous title is not actually a disagreement over the use of posthumous title.Its essence is the debate over Tang Huaixi policy:Zhang Zhongfang opposed Li Jifu's posthumous title of"Jingxian"("敬宪"),the main reason was that the Tang court was deadlocked in the battle of Huaixi and the future was poor.As a chancellor,Li Jifu should bear the main responsibility,the essence of which was the dissatisfaction of the battle of Huaixi and the policy of cutting the vassal power,that is,the recognition of Wu Yuanji's imitation of Heshuo Fanzhen independence.This view represented some officials in the Tang court,and the theory of cutting the vassal power was alien.However,Emperor Xianzong of Tang dethroned Zhang Zhongfang and awarded Li Jifu the posthumous title of"Zhongyi"(忠懿),which conveyed Emperor Xianzong's affirmation of the Huaixi War and predicted the implementation of the policy of reducing the vassal power in Emperor Xianzong's future.

关 键 词:李吉甫 敬宪 忠懿 淮西政策 

分 类 号:K242[历史地理—历史学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象