也谈儒墨的殊途与同归——兼与杨武金教授商榷  

On the Different Paths and the Same Goal of Confucianism and Mohism——Discussing with Professor YANG Wujin

作　　者：王颖 WANG Ying(School of Foreign Languages,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学外国语学院,北京100872

出　　处：《枣庄学院学报》2023年第4期30-34,共5页Journal of Zaozhuang University

摘　　要：杨武金教授在《儒与墨的殊途与同归》一文中把儒墨之争判定为同一社会问题的不同解决路径,基于此认为二者是殊途同归。但从文化审美心理层面进一步探讨二者“为何殊途,可否同归”也尤为重要。从互构语言文化学的视角下重新审视儒墨之间“天人相分”与“天人合一”的差别。由于地理环境与语言文字等因素的影响,中华民族的审美文化心理趋于伦理型而非逻辑型,如此殊途使墨家的没落有其必然性。但在中国文化“走出去”与中国特色对外话语体系建构这一时代背景下,儒墨的同归则又意味着墨学的复兴。Professor YANG Wujin summed up the dispute between Confucianism and Mohism as different solutions to the same social problem in the article"different roads lead to the same goal of Confucianism and Mohism".However,from the perspective of cultural aesthetic psychology,we can further explore"why are there different ways,whether they can reach the same goal".Re-examining the differences between Confucianism and Mohism from the perspective of intercultural linguistics and culturology is actually the difference between the thought of"separation between Man and Nature"and"unity of man and nature".The inducement of geography and language makes our nation's aesthetic and cultural psychology tend to be ethical rather than logical,which makes the decline of Mohism inevitable.However,under the background of"going out"of Chinese culture and the construction of foreign discourse system with Chinese characteristics,the common fate of Confucianism and Mohism means the revival of Mohism.

关 键 词：儒墨之争 互构语言学 天人相分 天人合一 

分 类 号：B224[哲学宗教—中国哲学]