检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王帅 陈玥卓 李晨光 Wang Shuai;Chen Yuezhuo;Li Chenguang(School of Economics,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学经济学院,北京100871
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2023年第14期94-102,共9页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(72073007)。
摘 要:2014年中国证监会出台针对创业板上市公司再融资政策,旨在为科技型中小企业研发创新活动提供金融支持。基于2009—2019年沪深A股上市公司样本,采用PSM-DID方法实证分析创业板再融资政策对企业创新产出的影响及作用机制。结果表明:再融资政策能够显著增加企业专利申请量和授权量,促进创新产出。机制分析发现,再融资政策可以通过缓解企业融资约束、提升现金流水平、增加研发投入和提高营运能力等方式促进企业创新产出。按照内部企业特征和外部市场环境对样本进行划分,回归分析结果发现,代理成本低、金融化程度低、非国有创业板上市公司将所募集资金用于研发创新活动的动机更强,面临较强外部市场监督、激烈的市场竞争或位于东部省市的创业板上市公司,其创新产出受再融资政策的正向影响更显著。因此,应进一步优化再融资制度,持续降低创业板上市公司再融资门槛,加强股权再融资事后监管与市场监督,加快完善创新驱动发展战略的金融支持体系。Innovation is the most crucial driving force for development and the strategic support for developing a modernized economy.Since the reform and opening up,it has been proven that small and medium-sized enterprises are the main body of innovation and the main force in promoting technological innovation.It is a key point to promote the transformation of old economic growth driver and achieve high-quality economic development by fully stimulating the development vitality of small and medium-sized enterprises and arousing their enthusiasm for innovation,and it's also of great significance to implement the innovation-driven development strategy.In 2009,the opening of GEM broadened financing channels for technology-oriented SMEs and provided strong financial support for their innovation.Subsequently,the GEM refinancing system has been absent for a period of time.In order to meet the urgent practical needs for refinancing SMEs,in 2014,China Securities Regulatory Commission launched the GEM refinancing policy to further broaden the financing channels for listed companies on GEM.Therefore it is necessary to study the impact of the refinancing policy and verify whether the policy can stimulate the R&D and innovation activities of SMEs and improve their innovation performance.By reviewing the existing literature,it is found that firstly the existing literature pays little attention to the impact of refinancing policies for technology-based SMEs on enterprise innovation.Secondly,there are few literatures focusing on the relationship between listed company refinancing and its innovation output.Finally,the existing literature mainly analyzes the impact of different financing methods on innovation from the perspective of the suitability between different financing methods and enterprise innovation activities,and studies a certain influencing factor of enterprise innovation activities alone.The GEM refinancing policy in 2014 had a policy impact only on GEM listed companies,providing a quasi-natural experiment for researchers to
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.151.13