“从事”之形式动词属性探究  

A Discussion on Dummy Verb Property of the Word“congshi”

作　　者：苏玲玲 白鸽 SU Ling-ling;BAI Ge(Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学,北京100872

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2023年第7期106-109,共4页Journal of Harbin University

基　　金：教育部产学合作协同育人研究项目,项目编号:202101225006。

摘　　要：“从事”是否能作为形式动词,现有研究尚存争议。文章基于原型范畴理论,比较了“从事”和形式动词原型“加以”二者的入句表现,以及它们在语料中加双音节及物动词的实例情况。研究发现加双音节及物动词时,“从事”和“加以”有部分相同的特征和功能,二者存在一定的形式动词“家族相似性”。但语料统计数据显示,搭配双音节及物动词在“从事”总体实例中仅占0.83%,远小于“加以”96%的实例占比,说明“从事”与形式动词原型“加以”的相似性低,因此“从事”加双音节及物动词时更宜被看作边缘(非典型)形式动词。Whether“congshi”can be used as a dummy verb is still controversial.Based on the prototype category theories,this paper compares the syntactic expression of the word“congshi”and the category prototype of dummy verb“jiayi”,combining with their usage in corpus when matching disyllabic transitive verb.It is found that they have a certain family resemblance of dummy verbs for sharing certain same features and functions.However,the corpus statistics show that the collocation of disyllabic transitive verbs accounts for only 0.83%of the total examples of“congshi”,which is far less than 96%of the examples of“jiayi”,indicating that the similarity between“congshi”and the category prototype of dummy verb“jiayi”is low so when matching disyllabic transitive verb,“congshi”should be regarded as a marginal(atypical)dummy verb.

关 键 词：从事 形式动词 原型范畴理论 家族相似性 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]