论贿赂推定的合理规制  

The Reasonable Regulation of Bribery Presumption

作　　者：沈磊 邵聪 SHEN Lei;SHAO Cong(Law Schoolof Peking University,Beijing,100871,China;Law School of of Suzhou University,Suzhou,215031,Jiangsu)

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871 [2]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215031

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2023年第2期64-73,共10页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

基　　金：2021年度中国法学会部级课题“监检衔接机制研究——以职务犯罪调查制度为重点”(CLS﹝2021﹞D65)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：2016年,两高以司法解释的形式创设了独具特色的贿赂推定。从整体来看,我国刑事推定仍处于粗放扩张阶段,而英美已经转向精细规制阶段。就域外国家和地区的贿赂推定而言,按推定事实的不同可分为三种类型,多属强制性推定但皆允许反驳。针对两高司法解释存在的侵害无罪推定原则、剥夺辩护权等问题,我国有必要对贿赂推定机制进行合理的规制。为此,必须实现贿赂推定的丰富化、多元化和柔性化,并实现推定反驳的法定化和标准化。In 2016,judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate creates a distinctive presumption of bribery.As a whole,China's criminal presumption is under the stage of extensive expanding,while England and United States have entered the stage of exquisite regulating of criminal presumption.As regards bribery presumptions in foreign countries and regions,they can be devided into three types based on presumed fact,most of which are mandatory and all are rebuttable.It's necessary and reasonable for China to establish the bribery presumption,but the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate has many problems like violating the presumption of innocence and depriving the right of defense,and should be improved.Therefore,China should make bribery presumptions abundant,multivariate and soft,and make the rebut of bribery presumption legalized and standardized.

关 键 词：贿赂推定 刑事推定 单层模式 双层模式 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]