检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢素珺[1] XIE Su-jun(Department of Law,Guangdong Justice Police Vocational College,Guangzhou Guangdong 510520,China)
机构地区:[1]广东司法警官职业学院法律系,广东广州510520
出 处:《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2023年第3期65-68,共4页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
摘 要:我国的医疗纠纷案件逐年增加,人民调解因具有独立性、专业性、高效性而被广泛运用于解决医疗纠纷案件中。实践中,医疗纠纷的焦点在于医疗行为的过错及过错程度认定、赔偿项目及计算标准的争议、鉴定意见应否采信等问题。应通过医疗鉴定先行、全面建立医疗责任保险制度、以“人”为中心进行调解、进一步提升人民调解员专业素质等措施来完善医疗纠纷人民调解机制。China’s medical dispute cases have increased nowadays,and people’s mediation is widely used to resolve them because of its independence,professionalism and efficiency.In practice,the focus of medical disputes lies in the following points:identification of fault and fault degree of medical behavior,disputes over compensation items and calculation standards,besides,whether expert opinions should be accepted.In order to improve the people’s mediation mechanism of medical disputes,measures should be taken,such as medical appraisal first,establishing a comprehensive medical liability insurance system,taking people as the center of mediation,and further improving the professional quality of people’s mediators.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.196.9