寻常痤疮患者美学干预情况及其影响因素分析  

Analysis of Cosmetic Intervention and Infl uencing Factors in Patients with Acne Vulgaris

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:彭诗韵 央金 徐冰 PENG Shiyun;YANG Jin;XU Bing(Department of Dermatology,Chongqing Fuling Central Hospital,Chongqing 411102,China;Department of Cosmetic Dermatology,Chongqing Zheng Quan Lige Medical Beauty Outpatient Clinic,Chongqing 400014,China)

机构地区:[1]重庆大学附属涪陵医院皮肤科,重庆411102 [2]重庆郑荃丽格医疗美容皮肤美容科,重庆400014

出  处:《中国美容医学》2023年第7期102-105,共4页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine

摘  要:目的:探讨寻常痤疮患者美学干预情况及其相关因素。方法:选取2021年1月-2021年12月笔者医院门诊就诊的寻常痤疮患者122例,记录所有患者美学干预情况(使用护肤品、美容介入手术等手段辅助治疗寻常痤疮),同时根据是否进行美学干预分为干预组和未干预组,比较两组人口社会学特征、疾病情况、生活质量等资料。采用多因素二元Logistic回归分析寻常痤疮患者采取美学干预的相关因素。结果:122例患者中,97例采取美学干预者分为干预组[干预组中53例(54.64%)使用护肤品,29例(29.90%)接受过美容介入手术治疗,15例(15.46%)接受过护肤品+美容介入手术治疗],25例未采取美学干预者分为未干预组;两组痤疮位于面部、痤疮严重程度、Cardiff痤疮伤残指数(Thecardiff acnedisabilityindex,CADI)、家庭收入对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素二元Logistic回归分析显示,痤疮位于面部(OR=12.567,95%CI=1.189~132.817)、痤疮程度重(OR=4.195,95%CI=1.174~14.984)、CADI高(OR=1.209,95%CI=1.053~1.388)、家庭收入高(OR=7.042,95%CI=2.004~24.751)为寻常痤疮患者采取美学干预的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论:寻常痤疮患者采取美学干预现象较为常见,痤疮位于面部、重度痤疮、CADI高、家庭收入高者更倾向性于选择美学干预。Objective To investigate cosmetic intervention and related factors in patients with acne vulgaris.Methods A total of 122 patients with acne vulgaris who visited the outpatient department of the author's hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were selected,and the cosmetic interventions of all patients(use of skin care products,cosmetic interventional surgery and other means to assist in the treatment of acne vulgaris)were observed.At the same time,the patients were divided into an intervention group and a non-intervention group according to whether or not the cosmetic intervention was performed.Multivariate binary Logistic regression was used to analyze the related factors of cosmetic intervention in acne vulgaris patients.Results Among the 122 patients,97 patients who took aesthetic intervention were classified as the intervention group[53 patients(54.64%)in the intervention group used skin care products,29 patients(29.90%)received cosmetic interventional surgery,15 patients(15.46%)received skin care products+cosmetic interventional surgery],25 patients who did not take aesthetic intervention were classifi ed as the non-intervention group.There were statistically signifi cant diff erences in acne location,acne severity,Cardiff Acne Disability Index(CADI),and family income between the two groups(P<0.05).Multivariate binary Logistic regression analysis showed that acne was located on the face(OR=12.567,95%CI=1.189-132.817),severe acne(OR=4.195,95%CI=1.174-14.984),and high CADI(OR=1.209,95%CI=1.053-1.388)and high family income(OR=7.042,95%CI=2.004-24.751)were the infl uencing factors of cosmetic intervention in acne vulgaris patients(P<0.05).Conclusion Aesthetic intervention is more common in acne vulgaris patients.Those with acne on the face,severe acne,high cardiffacne disability index and high family income are more inclined to choose aesthetic intervention.

关 键 词:寻常痤疮 美学干预 严重程度 生活质量 

分 类 号:R785.733[医药卫生—口腔医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象