检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭诗韵 央金 徐冰 PENG Shiyun;YANG Jin;XU Bing(Department of Dermatology,Chongqing Fuling Central Hospital,Chongqing 411102,China;Department of Cosmetic Dermatology,Chongqing Zheng Quan Lige Medical Beauty Outpatient Clinic,Chongqing 400014,China)
机构地区:[1]重庆大学附属涪陵医院皮肤科,重庆411102 [2]重庆郑荃丽格医疗美容皮肤美容科,重庆400014
出 处:《中国美容医学》2023年第7期102-105,共4页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨寻常痤疮患者美学干预情况及其相关因素。方法:选取2021年1月-2021年12月笔者医院门诊就诊的寻常痤疮患者122例,记录所有患者美学干预情况(使用护肤品、美容介入手术等手段辅助治疗寻常痤疮),同时根据是否进行美学干预分为干预组和未干预组,比较两组人口社会学特征、疾病情况、生活质量等资料。采用多因素二元Logistic回归分析寻常痤疮患者采取美学干预的相关因素。结果:122例患者中,97例采取美学干预者分为干预组[干预组中53例(54.64%)使用护肤品,29例(29.90%)接受过美容介入手术治疗,15例(15.46%)接受过护肤品+美容介入手术治疗],25例未采取美学干预者分为未干预组;两组痤疮位于面部、痤疮严重程度、Cardiff痤疮伤残指数(Thecardiff acnedisabilityindex,CADI)、家庭收入对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);多因素二元Logistic回归分析显示,痤疮位于面部(OR=12.567,95%CI=1.189~132.817)、痤疮程度重(OR=4.195,95%CI=1.174~14.984)、CADI高(OR=1.209,95%CI=1.053~1.388)、家庭收入高(OR=7.042,95%CI=2.004~24.751)为寻常痤疮患者采取美学干预的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论:寻常痤疮患者采取美学干预现象较为常见,痤疮位于面部、重度痤疮、CADI高、家庭收入高者更倾向性于选择美学干预。Objective To investigate cosmetic intervention and related factors in patients with acne vulgaris.Methods A total of 122 patients with acne vulgaris who visited the outpatient department of the author's hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were selected,and the cosmetic interventions of all patients(use of skin care products,cosmetic interventional surgery and other means to assist in the treatment of acne vulgaris)were observed.At the same time,the patients were divided into an intervention group and a non-intervention group according to whether or not the cosmetic intervention was performed.Multivariate binary Logistic regression was used to analyze the related factors of cosmetic intervention in acne vulgaris patients.Results Among the 122 patients,97 patients who took aesthetic intervention were classified as the intervention group[53 patients(54.64%)in the intervention group used skin care products,29 patients(29.90%)received cosmetic interventional surgery,15 patients(15.46%)received skin care products+cosmetic interventional surgery],25 patients who did not take aesthetic intervention were classifi ed as the non-intervention group.There were statistically signifi cant diff erences in acne location,acne severity,Cardiff Acne Disability Index(CADI),and family income between the two groups(P<0.05).Multivariate binary Logistic regression analysis showed that acne was located on the face(OR=12.567,95%CI=1.189-132.817),severe acne(OR=4.195,95%CI=1.174-14.984),and high CADI(OR=1.209,95%CI=1.053-1.388)and high family income(OR=7.042,95%CI=2.004-24.751)were the infl uencing factors of cosmetic intervention in acne vulgaris patients(P<0.05).Conclusion Aesthetic intervention is more common in acne vulgaris patients.Those with acne on the face,severe acne,high cardiffacne disability index and high family income are more inclined to choose aesthetic intervention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.72.3